Online Ads Quotes

Ads shouldn't be in people's way.

Yahoo!, over the years, had been the king of the banner ad.

I think you spend 50 percent of your mental energy trying to defeat ad systems.

Brave browsers block everything: initial signaling/analytics scripts that start the programmatic advertising 'dirty pipe', impression-tracking pixels, and ad-click confirmation signals.

Millennials don't want to be bombarded by ads. But what is so interesting to me, though, is how willingly they accept native content. Or native advertising - it's not even native content.

There are plenty of people who are willing to pay $2.6 million for 30 seconds on the Super Bowl and hundreds of thousands of dollars for 'American Idol.' There will be advertising dollars on the Internet. We're there as well. We win either way.

The online video ecosystems thrives largely on ads.

I think, by this point, almost everything on YouTube has some ad or another.

If you have a weakness for furry slippers or something, you might end up with that kind of advertising. It's a very complicated algorithmic decision. There's no one dude who's deciding what ads are going with things, and it's very individualized also. And that's the idea of collecting information is that in theory, you're showing people things that they should want to see or for which they are a good target. So, no, there's no master person.

If you subscribe to any online service, whether it be AOL, Google, Yahoo, or the Huffington Post, have you noticed that you are forced to watch a seemingly endless ad before the video story appears about a news item that caught your eye? AOL and the Huffington Post are especially annoying.

Facebook and Myspace are the U.S. audience, which is tried and true when it comes to being susceptible to ads.

Its definition can be a bit murky, but to me, native advertising is a sales pitch that fits right into the flow of the information being shown. It doesn't interrupt - native ads don't pop up or dance across the screen - and its content is actually valuable to the person viewing it.

If advertisers want to decorate their ads to increase their conversions by showing what users think, that's a good thing.

Buying a banner, you have no control whether ten different people see your ad once, or one person sees it ten times.

Using realtime ads, even mortgage companies can create ads that matter to you right now.

The funny thing about advertising is that it's not a zero-sum game... Historically, in the digital ad world, pie has gotten larger and it's possible for everyone to win, and it's perfectly possible that will continue to be true for quite some time.

To people who make moving ads that block the view of websites: Not only will we not buy from you, but we want shrews to eat your liver.

You can actually have a pitch button, you know, to get people on pitch.

While a traditional TV advert might last for 30 seconds, a child can play an advergame for hours on end.

If you go to a paintball subreddit, paintball companies can advertise to you.

Often when I'm talking about something, we could be talking about cats, and then I'll get adverts on my phone about cat food.

Ads are baked into content like chocolate chips into a cookie. Except, it’s actually more like raisins into a cookie - because nobody f-‍-‍-ing wants them there.

If people really don't want ads, they can go find their information however it is they want. It's a free world on that matter.