Eric Holder Quotes

At this time it was 6 years after the Home Financing Crisis and the Meltdown of 2008 and despite tens of thousands of law violations by the bank, the Justice Department was finally finishing their investigations and requiring some penalties. Other negotiations with other banks were in progress, but no bank executives were going to jail for the millions they handled fraudulently, whereas a burglar who stole household goods would do jail time.

In the Savings & Loan crises there were under 1000 bankers and others who had committed crimes, In the Meltdown of 2008, there were tens of thousands of criminals. Almost everyone connected with home mortgages broke the law, and all of the major banks in America had officers at the highest levels who committed perjury and fraud regarding foreclosure of mortgages. The biggest fish were involved as well as many thousands of others. Wall Street and the financial industry spend many millions in lobbying and campaign donations to be sure that there would be very few prosecutions and even then no major financial leaders would be called to account in a criminal court. The FBI had identified MILLIONS of cases of perjury and fraud in bank forclosures alone.

Barry Bonds was a star professional baseball player whose accomplishments were aided by taking illegal drugs. He lied about his use of drugs, and the Department made a very large effort over years to finally prosecute him. However during that time there were almost no prosecutions of the thousands of bankers and financiers who had lied, cheated, forged legal documents and in the process almost permanently ruined the American economy—the Great Recession of 2008. The Justice Department claimed that white collar cases are very complex and take longer to prepare prosecutions. Critics claimed that there are so many law breakers, that the government does not want to prosecute all the felons, but just go after a few, and this is easier if time has gone by and public anger has receded or been forgotten.

Actually a few minor characters were prosecuted for financial crimes committed during that period but none were prosecuted whose behavior caused or accelerated the meltdown, and no bank officers were prosecuted despite the FBI reporting that hundreds of thousands of Mortgage Foreclosure involved perjury by bank officers in a pattern that was used by most of the large major banks. The Obama administration was in the dilemma of either choosing one or two bank officers of whom to make an example or if all those who had committed serious crimes were prosecutors, it would involve thousands of the officers of almost every major bank and tens of thousands of officials and mortgage related firms. These were among the wealthiest and most influential people in the country, and there would be few left to build the American Banking System back up when that was one of our most important national priorities. They were also amongst the largest political contributors to both political parties. So the government bailed the bankers out financially, allowed them to maintain million dollar of more salaries and bonuses, and gave the entire batch of people who broke the law a de facto immunity from criminal prosecution. A further complicating factor was that many of the most egregious, greedy, and publicly harmful were not illegal as a result of much change in the law as a part of financial deregulation or were new schemes that the financial industry had successfully lobbied to prevent regulation as with Derivatives.

He was speaking for the Bush Administration. He was another regulation-opposed appointee of the George W. Bush Administration. He killed many regulations that had been developed to better regulate the banks and the mortgage industry to stop many of the obvious abuses of the industry. With few regulations in place, despite warnings such as {638024}, what had been greedy and dangerous practices of a minority of the industry became the vast majority when the bubble burst in the Meltdown. Note the rhetorical device of using “regulatory intrusion” rather than “regulation” or “more regulation”. This reflected an extreme conservative view that all regulation is bad – an “intrusion”, while most conservatives want a reasonable degree of regulation and not the elimination of all regulation.

Greenspan and some others assumed that the shareholders and the executives who ran the financial institutions had the same vested interests. But the executives had disconnected themselves from the fate of the shareholders, by having Golden Parachutes to protect the executives even if the business failed and they were fired. And they got their bonuses immediately so by the time the authorities and the shareholders discovered that the profits the bonuses were paid for were illusory, the bonus money was safely stored in a secret offshore bank. But if things went wrong, there was always the play of getting a government bailout which would keep the executives getting their huge bonuses and keep the shareholders from losing their money as the taxpayers covered most of the losses.

This warning was a decade before the Meltdown of 2008, but was not heeded by any of the politicians. As a result a number of the companies that made all those risky decisions assumed that if something went terribly wrong the government would not let them fail. Unfortunately, they were right and the taxpayers spent billions to prevent companies from failing. After the meltdown all the politicians vowed to end the too big to fail concept, but while some improvements were made, the Congress could not come to agreement, and the markets and a number of companies think that they are still too big to fail. This is particularly true for Defense Contractors where the government has and probably will in the future, protect irresponsible companies from failure if they are the only company that makes needed weapons and other equipment.

When the Meltdown hit America, the crisis drew attention to the fiscal solvency and stability of banks in most of the world. The Irish banks were much more overextended than those of most counties and when that came to light there was a bank panic in Ireland. Ahern and the Irish Dail (parliament) decided to bail out the Irish bank at a very great cost to the rest of the Irish economy and people. He believed if Lehman Brothers had been bailed out, as America did with other institutions, the Irish bank bubble would not have burst. It is not known whether he actually meant to use the word “testicles” or he made a gaff intending to use the word “tentacles”. Both have relevant meaning in the situation with a significant shade of difference in meaning between the two.

The Dodd Frank bill was designed, in the aftermath of the large bank induced meltdown of 2008 and the Great Recession, to regulate the banking industry so that no bank would be “too big to fail”. However, although the bill placed many restrictions on the banks to prevent much of their risky economic behavior, which the banks complained inhibited their growth and profitability. However, the bill did not put any limits on the size of the large banks and their critical proportion of the U. S. Financial System. If a bank was large enough, the government did not dare allow the bank to fail regardless of how profligate the Bank had been with its depositors’ money. So the shareholders made big money from the Bank’s risky behavior if it turned out well, and if not the taxpayers had to bail the banks out, because they were too big to fail without causing much of the rest of the country to also fail. Warren and others wanted a simple solution. Break up the large banks into smaller ones and then if any one of the small units makes poor investments, the bank could fail and other than its shareholders and creditors, the effect would not be so serious that the government could not allow the bank to go into bankruptcy. Mismanaged banks could fail like other mismanaged companies and not take down much or the rest of the country with them. But the banks lobbied to prevent that, and by 2014, 6 years after the taxpayers had to bail out banks that were too big to fail, many of the banks were twice as large as they were when they were already too big to fail.

Attempting to defend charges that his bank and others were engaged in monopolistic practices:

The result was regulation of the banks and the creation of the SEC to regulate the stock market, However, over the years, the regulations were not able to keep up with the sophisticated development of new forms of investments and financial instruments and the financial industry were able to speculate with other people’s money in ways that FDR and his reformers never imagined. Finally, even the regulation that did exist was weakened by the policies of the George W. Bush administration and the combination brought about the Great Recession of 2008 where the profits from excess speculation were privatized and the losses, socialized with the taxpayer and the American worker bearing the brunt while most of the speculators were bailed out and made more money than ever. The Obama administration tried to reform the situation, but was unable to put an end to the legal speculation with other people’s money or of having institutions that were “too big to fail.”

For many general government regulations—labor, environment, non discrimination—the small business has a proportionately heavier burden of compliance. So large businesses have always been able to count on small business to lobby against regulation and for deregulation. However, when it comes to financial regulation such as the Dodd-Frank regulations essentially apply to large businesses. As a matter of fact, small businesses were on many ways the most frequent victims of the large banks and investment bank excesses in the Meltdown of 2008. Before most of the regulations could even take effect, the financial industry was already trying to get small business to lobby to roll back the protective regulations preventing future meltdowns and bank failure resulting from loose regulation and greedy irresponsible financial industry behavior. The President campaigned to convince the small business not to support the finance industry over their usual “knee jerk” reaction to any regulation.

In the Great Recession thousands of bank executives of the banks that received government bailouts committed fraud and perjury providing false information under oath and foreclosing on mortgages illegally. There were so many bank felons that the Justice Department decided not to prosecute any of them and let the Banks pay relatively small fines instead. Then the banks paid the crooked employees bonuses. Paul was one of the few members of Congress who favored prosecution of all the guilty bankers regardless of the number.

He was referring to Fannie Mae, the government-created. private mortage guarantee company. It was heavily regulated, and in general it met the regulatory requirements. However, the requirements were insufficient, and in the 2008 Meltdown and the Great Recession that followed, Fannie Mae itself was in such bad financial condition, that the Federal Government had bail them out or have the entire home mortgage industry fall apart.