Freddie Wong Quotes

If you're creating an entertainment site, you want the content to be the star.

If you make compelling television, they will come.

I look for good scripts, not anything. It should inspire me, and the audience should like it.

Never underestimate the intelligence of the audience; make good programmes, and they will come.

Sometimes a movie knows you're watching it. It knows how to hold and keep you, how, when it's over, to make you want it all over again.

There's no difference between movies and television. None at all. Except in a lot of cases, television's much better than movies.

I'm not setting 'Jericho' up to be anything other than what it is, which is, you know, a piece of good, well thought-out, well put-together TV and entertainment.

The challenge is to stay true to the characters while also having them be entertaining every day, because it turns out that just watching someone be true to themselves isn't that rad to watch.

What I want to impart on any movie I work on is I want to make it entertaining. That's what I feel I do.

It's too easy to underestimate your audience. But it's not rocket science: bad plays don't get people on seats; good plays do.

If a film is entertaining, it will work irrespective of anything. It should be entertaining and engaging; otherwise, it becomes a documentary.

I have to make sure, when you start seeing a film, you are going to see it until the end. I have to, of course, entertain you a little bit. The real question is how far do I go?

Our responsibility is to deliver the most compelling content to our players. and if we do that, the audiences are there.

All we think about is how to keep the audience engaged, and normally we're big on plot because that's the easy way to do it.

I think that every book that's in a bookstore should entertain in some way.

Great writing makes great television.

Obviously, a theatrical masterpiece needs more than a plot; many television shows are nothing but plot, and it is doubtful that they will stand the test of time. But I also don't think that making fun of plot or acting like we're all somehow 'above' structure is such a good idea.

When people are telling stories on screen, you can show the reactions of people, play it off those reactions, and it can be fun. But when it's someone just giving an opinion on things, even if the opinion is kind of interesting, that is potentially deadly. It has to be really quick.

Cinema now can't be just about introspection and atma manthan; such topics won't work.

I don't think hype always works. It can get you initial audience, but eventually, it's your story, and the characters need to hold audience's attention.

I think it's intelligent, emotional, character-rich storytelling - at the core, I think those are the most important elements, and I think they can be found across all of our dayparts. That's what, for me, ABC really stands for.

I think too often in films, people think endings are a summation of plot, and I don't like that. Because once you know where you're going as an audience member, then it's like a video game. You're just waiting for them to get through the levels and beat the bad guy. And I just think that's boring.

Films are never meant as solutions; they just provide entertainment value.

I like shows for atmosphere. I don't know, I think a plot-driven show is so boring and masc4masc and gross.

In the past, a lot of films based on video games think that the audience wants to experience what it's like to play the game, and that's absolutely not the case.