Wages Quotes
Samuel Langhorne Clemens, 1835-1910. This quotation had even more meaning a century later when the gap in wages between a knowledge worker and a manual worker had increased many fold.
Ford was then 74 years old and had become a very different man than in his youth when he was the hero of labor. He was very paranoid at this time. He even thought that financiers were actually backing the labor unions because their purpose was to go to war against Hitler who Ford greatly admired and supported. See {642379}. He claimed that the way they would do it is to fund the labor unions so most workers would join unions. This he thought would eliminate competition and lower workers’ wages. When workers’ wages were pushed low enough, the workers would demand American entry into the war to create government spending on armaments and a labor shortage to drive wages up again. There was not a single financier who was actually paying or lending any money to labor unions, and most industrialists other than Ford complained that labor unions would always demand higher wages. Ford’s son Edsel was the chief operating officer of Ford Motor Company, and did his best to work around his father to keep the company healthy and deal with a terrible labor relations problem his father caused.
She was referring to the high percentage of Rockefeller workers who were killed in industrial accidents with little or no management concern for workplace safety. In addition, she accused Rockefeller (and other very rich employers) of paying such low wages that full time workers lived in abject poverty and suffering the short lifespan that went with poverty then (and even today, but less so.)
There was a movement to pay married women who were housewives to compensate them for the time they spend in, if nothing else, educating and bringing up male children who were educated. It was they who transmitted the values and many experts agree have more to do with a child’s education than the schools do. So this important and critical societal task was not remunerated as were all others. At the time, even many of the feminists held the view that society would be better off if women were homemakers and brought up the children. However, without any pay (and at the time few or no rights to a husbands earnings of assets) she was bound to be a second class citizen. That idea of housewife compensation obtained almost no support, and the only way for women to gain some kind of position and equality was to work outside the home—the condition that became the norm about 30 years after this was written.
At the time English democracy was still suspect especially among the aristocracy.
He and other founders believed that Blacks freed from slavery would still suppress wages for whites and hurt industry. The possibility of intermarriage was also viewed as a moral degeneration. Approximately 15,000 Blacks chose to emigrate.
At the time, industrialists could not even conceive of the notion of negotiating over wages must less collective bargaining.
Corporate Executives had urged that the laws requiring overtime pay for more than a 40 hour week be put in abeyance for the remainder of the war. Increased production was necessary for the war effort and manpower was getting short. When the Automobile Workers Union proposed that the wealthy executives also accept “patriotic” limits, the executives wanted little part in that plan. The manpower pressure was relieved when women entered the manufacturing plants but most executives and male union members and officers did not think that women could possibly be even as productive. They were wrong as women learned critical skills as they had the opportunity and out-produced the pre-war men.
At the time being a seaman was a very dangerous job with a high rate of injury and disease from foreign ports. Congress passed and President John Adams signed this law which provided some marine health services for seaman. However, the reason it is politically most interesting is that it is the first Federal mandate on private citizens. Further it actually required that sailors who were privately employed purchase health insurance. The Federal government was the single payer in what many conservatives would call “socialized medicine.” What is fascinating is that in the huge political debate of the Obama administration over the mandate to buy health insurance this precedent virtually never appeared in the arguments, court cases, news media and political debates. Forbes Magazine ran an article about it in 2011 (http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2011/01/17/congress-passes-socialized-medicine-and-mandates-health-insurance-in-1798/2/ ) As passionate as everyone else was, they just didn’t know the political history of our own country enough to use the example in the debate. This was also the first example of Federal “withholding” where the employer collects the money from the individual by withholding it from his pay and turns it over to the federal government.
Executed by the English for his part in the Easter Uprising. Most revolutionaries seeking independence become so focused on their revolution that they begin to believe that independence will solve all problems. Connelly was one of the more sophisticated ones who realized that many of the economic problems of Ireland had nothing to do with independence or the lack thereof.
This is not a common quotation from Thoreau. The great man for whom the establishment had so much respect had a very anti-capitalist streak. His view is that the employer will generally never pay his laborers a fair wage. Instead he will pay the laborer the lowest rate for which he can obtain the laborers services. If the laborer generates added value for his wage, the employer is in a zero sum game with the laborer. If part of the added value—the profit is paid to the laborer, the employer does not have it for himself (or his stockholders). In most cases, the laborer is forced to work for his and his family’s subsistence. This theory argues that they only way the laborer will get a fair wage is if there is a labor shortage (assuming no government laws or union pressure is in the picture. Many capitalists argue that a “fair” wage is what a free man is willing to work for and a free employer is willing to pay. So economics is like politics in general with respect to fairness—there is no universally accepted definition of what is fair.
The left has always been ambivalent about automation. Many object to it on the grounds that it puts men out of work. However, others such as Lafage, argued that automation was the only economic way to reform the working hours and conditions of labor. The problem at the time was that as long as labor was so cheap, there was no motivation for the manufacturer to invest in better machinery. He and many others argued that minimum wages and their increases increase productivity because it would force manufacturers to invest in more productive equipment to reduce their labor costs.
Zenzinov was often a critic of the Bolsheviks.
This appears to be the first political use of the phrase. It would take a century for legislation in some states to mandate a living wage. Roosevelt, as a reformer was incredibly ahead of his time.
