Saddam Hussein Quotes

Finally Germany's attack on Russia seemed to confirm that Russia was not shirking and was prepared to carry out a foreign policy with the risk of war with Germany.

Any Israeli attack on Lebanon, Iran, Syria or Gaza will be met with a fierce response.

We ought to nuke North Korea right about now just to give the world a warning.

If Americans are entitled to hit Iraq unilaterally, then why isn't Russia entitled to the same with respect to Georgia? Why is China not entitled to the same with respect to some other neighboring country which, according to Chinese views, may be supporting insurrection in Tibet or Shenyang? Why, say, India is not entitled to hit Pakistan, which openly supports terrorists in Kashmir and which has nuclear weapons, and which has a very fragile domestic situation under which fundamentalists any day can come to power

Go tell your general for me that if he does not immediately withdraw his men, I will send them to hell!

Appeasement does not work. As was the case in the 1930s, we see in Saddam Hussein an aggressive dictator threatening his neighbors.

I'd like to see a more aggressive attitude on the part of the United States. That doesn't mean launching an immediate preventive war.

You have my assurance that we will respond with full force should the settlement be violated by North Vietnam.

On the McLaughlin Report, August 26, 1990: 'There are only two groups that are beating the drums for war in the middle East, the Israeli Defense Ministry and its amen corner in the United States.

It's just a matter of time before we go into Iraq and get Saddam Hussein. I think just before Bush falls below 50 percent, that's when we'll be going.

The problem with the war in Iraq is not so much the intelligence as the stupidity.

By threatening war against Iran, Iraq and North Korea in his now-famous "Axis of Evil" address, the president painted himself into a corner. Either Bush now goes to war against one of these regimes, or he will be humiliated and exposed as a bellicose bluff.

Israeli government & the neocons want US to bomb Iran.

I am deeply skeptical of re-entering into Iraq's civil war.

The president's rattling the saber and beating the drums may have an effect.

Republican control of the Senate = expanded neocon wars in Syria and Iraq. Boots on the ground are coming!

Before our kids start coming home from Iraq in body bags and women and children start dying in Baghdad, I need to know, what did Iraq do to us?

Maybe we ought to consider a Golden Rule in foreign policy: Don't do to other nations what we don't want happening to us. We endlessly bomb these countries and then we wonder why they get upset with us?

The question is the morning after. What sort of Iraq do we wake up to after the bombing? What happens in the region? What impact could it have? These are questions leaders I have spoken to have posed.

If you militarise a situation, you beg for an armed response.

I don’t care what the international lawyers say, we are going to kick some ass.

History teaches, perhaps, very few clear lessons. But surely one such lesson learned by the world at great cost is that aggression, unopposed, becomes a contagious disease.

I could have been very popular if I had launched a military attack on Iran but I chose patience.

If Iranian Missiles Hit Israel, I Will Dance in Trafalgar Square.

If one single chemical warhead falls on Israel, we’ll hit Iraq with everything we have got.... look at your watch and forty minutes later an Iraqi city will be reduced to ashes.