Charles Leclerc Quotes

Meritocracy is a good thing. Whenever possibly, people should be judged based on their work and results, not superficial qualities.

People should be judged on the basis of their performance, not nationality, personality, education, or personal traits and skills.

The game has a cleanness. If you do a good job, the numbers say so. You don't have to ask anyone or play politics. You don't have to wait for the reviews.

In Italy they judge you above all on your efficiency.

When a player deserves to play, with me, he'll play.

In the workplace, employees should be judged on their merit and hard work and not on aspects that are irrelevant to their performance.

You need to mesh the voices of people with expertise and meritocracy.

City employees will be hired and promoted because of their abilities - without outside interference.

It doesn't matter what your pedigree is, who your family is or what degrees you have. What really matters is how you perform your job and how you produce results. Whoever could do the best job, that's who the focus is on - and it definitely doesn't matter if I am a woman or a man.

I am not in favour of quotas. Just put the best person into the job. It is not about gender; it is about experience, leadership and vision.

On my team, we prioritize merits over politics.

I want my work to be judged, not me.

Everybody, be they female, whatever your religion, whatever your nationality, you're an individual, and if you perform well, we want you, and if you don't, we don't.

For me, at the end of the day, I want to be judged for my work, not for what I've been through and past experiences, necessarily.

I'm looking for the best person irregardless of political party, of race or religion, or color of their skin. Those things don't matter to me. I want someone who's qualified, who has a qualification to character and the integrity to do the things that have to be done to save this world.

You need to earn your spurs through performance, not interviews.

No one man has any more intrinsic right to official station than another .... The duties of all public officers are ... so plain and simple that men of intelligence may readily qualify themselves for their performance.

It is also absolutely necessary that the examinations should be competitive, and the appointments given to those who are most successful. A mere pass examination never, in the long run, does more than exclude absolute dunces.

I believe in a Republic of Merit in which water is allowed to find its own level, where voters, like drivers, are tested before being turned loose.

The person who does that role better than anyone else is the person who should get that role, regardless of their background or heritage.

At the end of the day, you have to look at, 'Are they knowledgeable? Are they doing their job?' Not what their appearance is.

It is not about gender, it is about experience, leadership, and vision.

My father values talent. He recognizes real knowledge and skill when he finds it. He is color blind and gender neutral. He hires the best person for the job, period.

In my experience and observation, senior appointments are rarely based entirely on merit.

We will give importance to performance while choosing officials.