Henry Hazlitt Quotes
In practice [monetary management] is merely a high-sounding euphemism for continuous currency debasement. It consists of constant lying in order to support constant swindling. Instead of automatic currencies based on gold, people are forced to take managed currencies based on guile. Instead of precious metals they hold paper promises whose value falls with every bureaucratic whim. And they are suavely assured that only hopelessly antiquated minds dream of returning to truth and honesty and solvency and gold.
Hazlitt, Henry. What You Should Know About Inflation. D. Van Nostrand, 1960, p. 24.
What Franklin Delano Roosevelt began, President Nixon would in 1971 complete by removing America from the gold standard entirely and ending fixed rates of exchange. There have been those in government who did not understand the modern economics of money and who believed that currency had to have a fixed rate of exchange for gold or silver otherwise it was worthless. Roosevelt had to deal with them as did Nixon later. Even into the 21st century when it had been amply demonstrated that the best currency in the world was the United States dollar precisely because it was backed up by the full faith and credit of the United States Government, there were those who complain that United States money is not sound currency and argue for the return of the gold standard.
Most of the Founding Fathers would be scandalized by the banking and finance system we have in modern times. There is not a single bank in the nation that would meet Adams’ criteria for not being a “cheat.” See {615649} for a similar view and {630666} for another quote by Adams regarding banks. Interestingly, Adams was a very conservative politician and generally supported the establishment, but banks at that time were not thought of as part of the establishment. They had a somewhat unwholesome reputation at best.
When gold and silver were used to make coins, there were dozens of schemes to cheat people. Many of these would be implemented by the official mints (makers of coins) often with the connivance of the ruler who would often get a cut. Davanzati warned princes against debasing the coins on moral as well as pragmatic grounds.
Conservatives are surprised to learn that their great economic nemesis was one of the early economists who saw the danger of paper money and government control over the minting of money which is one of their core concerns.
The same argument can be made against the modern paper money supply. What Jefferson and most of the founding fathers, with the exception of Alexander Hamilton. did not realize was that the major stability of any kind of money was not only the silver or gold that backed it but the political and legal stability of the nation and the size of its productive economy. Where Jefferson was right however is that all these banknotes at the time were issued by local private banks. The Government had no responsibility for paper money and had no knowledge of how much paper money any bank issues and whether or not they had any silver to back it up. Banks didn’t trust other bank’s notes and would only redeem them at a discount. A $10 note from a South Carolina bank might only be worth $7 in New York and $6 in Boston. The early American monetary system was a mess.
At the time, a bank note—paper money issued be a private bank—was not backed by any gold or silver and was not insured bym the government. A bank could print as much as they wanted, so it was always worth less as the further you were from the particular issuing bank, the less you could get your bank note, because no one knew whether or not the issuing bank would redeem the note or even be in existence. So every private bank note had diminished value for the public. However, carrying gold and silver around and making change for precious metals was difficult and often impractical. So people used banknotes. The same thing happens with credit cards today. The merchant has to pay a fee to the credit card company and the bank and therefore charges us more for whatever we buy. But most consumers and merchants are willing to pay the difference to obtain the convenience of the credit card,
This is a remarkable quotation in that it proposed exactly what the United States did in the Nixon administration. We went off the gold standard and backed American money with the wealth and “full faith and credit” of the nation and all its assets. It has been the strongest and most sought after currency in the world despite the fact that it is not backed by gold or silver as earlier American currency was.
Economists they world over have differed as to how critical it was to have a money supply that is based on a gold standard or other precious metal. United States history has had a dispute over whether the money should be backed by gold or silver. Finally, under the Richard M. Nixon administration, the United States went off the gold standard and American money ever since is only backed by the ‘full faith and credit’ of the United States. Some politicians like Paul believe this is a poor policy since it allows governments to control their own money supply irrespective of their gold or silver holdings. Paul goes further than most and sees freedom itself dependent on a precious metal standard. Most politicians disagree.
Later, William Jennings Bryan and the Populists turned this point into a major political issue. See Bryan’s Cross of Gold Speech.
This is a very interesting quotation in that it is one of the first suggestions that money debasement can be caused by a lack of trust and confidence in the government rather than the percentage of precious metals in the coins.
Henry Stuart Hazlitt was an American journalist who wrote about business and economics for such publications as The Wall Street Journal, The Nation, The American Mercury, Newsweek, and The New York Times.
