Mohammad Javad Zarif Quotes
I have lost every respect for U.S. justice. The judgment by the Supreme Court and the other, even more absurd judgment by a New York circuit court deciding that Iran should pay damages for 9/11 are the height of absurdity.
Wright, Robin. "Iran’s Foreign Minister on U.S. Sanctions, Syria, and the Bomb." The New Yorker, Condé Nast, 25 Apr. 2016.
The concern of extreme wings of various parties with judicial activism is not limited to the United States.
Chase a Supreme Court justice at the time was a very partisan Federalist. The Senate was controlled by the Democratic Republicans. Randolph, then a member of the House of Representatives, orchestrated the impeachment of Chase because of his extreme partisanship. The Senate in trying the case had to decide for the first time what “high crimes and misdemeanors” the actually means in terms of impeachment. A number of the Democratic Republicans joined the Federalists in taking the view that however undesirable the Supreme Court justice’s partisanship would be, that did not reach the threshold of a “high crime and misdemeanor.” Chase was acquitted. In this sense this impeachment trial was similar to that of President William Clinton almost 200 years later. The behavior was undesirable but did not amount to a high crime and misdemeanor, Clinton was also acquitted.
This was a terrible Supreme Court decision which placed slave owning whites against whites who opposed slavery in conflict over runaway slaves and free blacks throughout the country. It held that Blacks—even free Blacks had no Constitutional rights and was one of the major causes of the Civil War. See {623426}.
This kind of attack on the Supreme Court by a prominent legal figure is quite unusual. However, the appointment of the ideologue, Clarence Thomas and his effect on the balance of the court triggered much controversy.
Adopted by the original Edinburgh Review Magazine as its motto.
Johnson, fundamentally an inveterate racist, tried to kill all attempts at protecting Negro rights after the Civil War. Congress rewrote the Bill to obtain enough signatures and then passed it over the President’s Veto later in the year.
In modern America, we have improved somewhat. Now both kinds of issues take many years.
In general, Justice Jackson was correct. Almost all major Supreme Court decisions that have ruled against the Legislative Branch or the Executive Branch, have been, reversed by a future Supreme Court, reversed by new legislation, reversed by a subsequent Constitutional Amendment, reversed by science or technology, or acknowledged by future generations to be wrong but were now moot and needed no correcting. The greatest of the Supreme Court decisions have generally been those that upheld the Congress and the Executive.
At the time, there was a very sharply divided Supreme Court with the majority consisting of very conservative justices who did not follow the principle of Stare Decisus and had overturned a number of previous Supreme Court opinions with which their ideology was in conflict.
Mohammad Javad Zarif is an Iranian career diplomat and academic. He has been foreign minister of Iran since 2013. During his tenure as foreign minister, he led the Iranian negotiation with P5+1 countries which produced the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action on 14 July 2015, lifting the economic sanctions against Iran on 16 January 2016. On 25 February 2019, Zarif resigned from his post as foreign minister. His resignation was rejected by President Hassan Rouhani and he continues as foreign minister.