Right to Publish Quotes

Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost

Freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and freedom of religion all have a double aspect—freedom of thought and freedom of action.

The Liberty of Conscience and of the Press cannot be cancelled, abridged, restrained, or modified by any authority of the United States

We have a natural right to make use of our pens as of our tongue, at our peril, risk and hazard.

Somebody ought to do on article on you, on your damn profession, your 1st Amendment.

The 1st Amendment does not mandate that the press be accurate.

The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.

The Washington Times wrote a story questioning the authenticity of some of the suggestions made about me in Silent Coup. But as a believer in the First Amendment, I believe they have more than a right to air their views.

Journalists and everyone in America has a constitutional right to express themselves or write what they want to write.

There's no law preventing a journalist from publishing whatever they want.

The liberty of the press is the Palladium of all the civil, political, and religious rights of an Englishman.

I can only assume that your editorial writer tripped over the First Amendment and thought it was the office cat.

In the U.S., free speech and the press are protected by the First Amendment. It has a clarity unmatched by modern legislators and declares that 'Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or the press.'

I know that I have the right freely to speak and publish my sentiments, subject only to the laws of the land for the abuse of that right.

That the people have a right to freedom of speech, and of writing and publishing their sentiments; therefore, the freedom of the press ought not be restrained.

The liberty of the Press is the Palladium of all the civil, political and religious rights of an Englishman.

I believe that the defendants had as much right to publish as the Government has to publish the Constitution.

Freedom to publish means freedom for all and not for some. Freedom to publish is guaranteed by the constitution but freedom to continue to prevent others from publishing is not.

Freedom of expression is freedom of information

If a corporation can express opinions and be protected in doing so by the First Amendment, then there's no reason logically one wouldn't think they could undertake to enjoy the other rights protected under the First Amendment.

Thought is more than a right - it is the very breath of man. Whoever fetters thought attacks man himself. To speak, to write, to publish, are things, so far as the right is concerned, absolutely identical. They are the ever-enlarging circles of intelligence in action; they are the sonorous waves of thought.

The liberty of the press is indeed essential to the nature of a free state, but this consists in laying no previous restraints upon publications, and not in freedom from censure for criminal matter when published.

As long as I am an American citizen, and as long as American blood runs in these veins, I shall hold myself at liberty to speak, to write, and to publish whatever I please on any subject, being amenable to the laws of my country for the same.

But I know newspapers. They have the first amendment and they can tell any lie knowing it's a lie and they're protected if the person's famous or it's a company.

I think the moment anybody seriously tampers with the First Amendment, you're going to see an outcry.