Kazuhito Ikeo Quotes
The Japanese financial system … gives higher priority to the interest of banks and other financial institutions than to that of users.
Kazuhito Ikeo, Japanese Economist, Speech, Japan National Press Club, May 1997
Sourced by: Eigen's Political and Historical Quotations
She was the only major Federal Official who did not support the bailouts of the banks and their bondholders and shareholders. Not one of her insured bank depositors lost their insured funds in the financial crisis. She protected them all but would not protect the banks themselves. Other officials did that and the following year the bank executives took the bailout money and paid themselves and others in the bank huge bonuses when the banks lost billions.
The savings and loan crises became clear shortly thereafter.
The result was regulation of the banks and the creation of the SEC to regulate the stock market, However, over the years, the regulations were not able to keep up with the sophisticated development of new forms of investments and financial instruments and the financial industry were able to speculate with other people’s money in ways that FDR and his reformers never imagined. Finally, even the regulation that did exist was weakened by the policies of the George W. Bush administration and the combination brought about the Great Recession of 2008 where the profits from excess speculation were privatized and the losses, socialized with the taxpayer and the American worker bearing the brunt while most of the speculators were bailed out and made more money than ever. The Obama administration tried to reform the situation, but was unable to put an end to the legal speculation with other people’s money or of having institutions that were “too big to fail.”
Carney was a Canadian. Under a quirk of British law, the Governor of the Bank of England need not be a British citizen so long as he is a citizen of a Country of the British Empire.
Sovereign credit substitution is where the government, one way or another, assumes and guarantees the debts of private corporations. This is an elegant way of saying: “taxpayer bailouts”
After the Great Recession the Mexican bankers, like their American counterparts, tightened their credit standards so much that the only people who could get loans were the ones who didn’t need it. If banks do not make loans, it matters not that they are solid institutions that are well capitalized.
Greenspan accepted this as many other economists and financial regulators did. What they did not take into account was the incredible greed of many of the financial executive who were betting with their customers money, If the bet was right they, the shareholders and the customers all made out very well as they were highly leveraged. If the bet was wrong, the shareholders and customers lost a lot, and the financial executives only made their multimillion dollar salaries and bonuses (Many were actually were guaranteed their bonuses even if they put the company into bankruptcy.) Worse, they earned their money when they made their sales or earnings targets, but when the securities they bought went sour, even if the company had no funds left, the. It was “heads we all win and tails only I win.” The vested interests between the financial company executives, the shareholders, and the clients were divergent, and the customer was at the bottom of the money pole.
This warning was a decade before the Meltdown of 2008, but was not heeded by any of the politicians. As a result a number of the companies that made all those risky decisions assumed that if something went terribly wrong the government would not let them fail. Unfortunately, they were right and the taxpayers spent billions to prevent companies from failing. After the meltdown all the politicians vowed to end the too big to fail concept, but while some improvements were made, the Congress could not come to agreement, and the markets and a number of companies think that they are still too big to fail. This is particularly true for Defense Contractors where the government has and probably will in the future, protect irresponsible companies from failure if they are the only company that makes needed weapons and other equipment.
Banks often lie. The system encourages them to do so. In a crisis, if a bank honestly says that it is not sure that it has enough cash and other liquid assets, others will not lend it any more money and depositors will rush to withdraw their money, thereby almost insuring a failure. The bank that lies, might weather the storm and survive.
