Ray Comfort Quotes

Right thinking creationists do not impugn evolution. What we reject is a universe that made itself out of nothing.

I'd be perfectly happy with a mathematically precise description of how time began. I see science and religion as being two completely different things. I don't see science as relevant to the question of whether or not there's a God.

Atheistic evolutionists believe that nothing created everything - a scientific impossibility. It couldn't happen. So they redefine the word 'nothing' to mean 'something,' so that in their unthinking minds, they can justify their foolishness.

It is embarrassingly unscientific to speak of anything creating itself from nothing.

We are the products of a highly intelligent and creative supreme being.

Evolution and creationism both require faith. It's just a matter of where you choose to place that faith.

Evolution is true, it happens, it is the way the world is, and we too are one of its products. This does not mean that evolution does not have metaphysical implications; I remain convinced that this is the case.

Scripture suggests that the elements in space were created for the benefit of earth, while evolution suggests that earth is an insignificant speck in vast space.

Creation is absolute, 100 percent scientific proof that there was a Creator.

I don't know whether the universe contains any evidence of intelligent design, but I can assure you that thousands of everyday products do not.

I find that easier to accept than this all happened out of nothing.

The source and center of all man's creative power... is his power of making images, or the power of imagination.

We know, on the authority of Moses, that longer ago than six thousand years the world did not exist

Doesn't assuming that an intelligence created these perfect conditions require far less faith than believing that a life-sustaining Earth just happened to beat the inconceivable odds to come into being?

There's nothing unnatural in creation.

Most people, I believe, think that you need a God to explain the existence of the world, and especially the existence of life. They are wrong, but our education system is such that many people don't know it.

If we want to postulate a deity capable of engineering all the organized complexity in the world, either instantaneously or by guiding evolution, that deity must have been vastly complex in the first place. The creationist, whether a naive Bible-thumper or an educated bishop, simply postulates an already existing being of prodigious intelligence and complexity. If we are going to allow ourselves the luxury of postulating organized complexity without offering an explanation, we might as well make a job of it and simply postulate the existence of life as we know it!

I personally believe, as many Montanans do, that God created the Earth.

Darwin begins by assuming life upon the earth; the Bible reveals the source of life and chronicles its creation.

The universe displays no proof of an all-directing mind.

I believe that the science of chemistry alone almost proves the existence of an intelligent creator.

What good is strength if you have no sense?

We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully 'designed' to have come into existence by chance.

Did God make man in a breath of holy fire, or did he crawl on up out of the muck and mire?

I - do I believe in evolution? I embrace the view that God created the heavens and the earth, the seas and all that's in them.