Dwight Schultz Quotes

Something cannot emerge from nothing.

It is embarrassingly unscientific to speak of anything creating itself from nothing.

Doesn't assuming that an intelligence created these perfect conditions require far less faith than believing that a life-sustaining Earth just happened to beat the inconceivable odds to come into being?

I don't even really know what the big bang is, and so when people want to go through and say, 'Well, I believe that the universe started by God starting it,' that's fine by me.

Scripture suggests that the elements in space were created for the benefit of earth, while evolution suggests that earth is an insignificant speck in vast space.

Atheistic evolutionists believe that nothing created everything - a scientific impossibility. It couldn't happen. So they redefine the word 'nothing' to mean 'something,' so that in their unthinking minds, they can justify their foolishness.

Right thinking creationists do not impugn evolution. What we reject is a universe that made itself out of nothing.

If you say that there was no first cause (a Creator), then you are stuck with the unscientific and thoughtless belief that nothing created everything. So, what is it that you believe? Is it that something created everything? Then you are not an atheist, because you believe in a Creator.

Nothing can come of nothing.

Creation is not taking place now, so far as can be observed. Therefore, it was accomplished sometime in the past, if at all, and thus is inaccessible to the scientific method.

Out of nothing can come, and nothing can become nothing.

God may exist, but science can explain the universe without the need for a creator.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

Professor Hawking is heralded as 'the genius of Britain,' yet he believes in the scientific impossibility that nothing created everything and that life sprang from non-life. Why should anyone believe Mr. Hawking's writings if he cannot provide evidence for his unscientific belief that out of nothing, everything came?

All of creation, in the biblical view, was to ultimately prepare the way for the creation of man. But one does not need the Bible alone to hold this view. A purely scientific reading of the universe is in keeping with this view. Everything - every natural and physical law - is exquisitely tuned to produce life, and ultimately man, on earth.

I don't know whether the universe contains any evidence of intelligent design, but I can assure you that thousands of everyday products do not.

Only an unscientific ignoramus would hold to the thought that nothing created everything.

Creationism means simply a belief in creation

It took less than an hour to make the atoms, a few hundred million years to make the stars and planets, but five billion years to make man!

I can't remember if it was in the third grade in school, I was being told that two amoeba happened to hit in a muddy puddle of water two billion years ago, and I was an accident. I was the result. I wasn't real smart, but I said, 'I don't like the sound of that.'

Something pretty mysterious had to give rise to the origin of the universe.

It's not a coincidence that the Bible starts with Genesis. Most people really want to know where we came from and where everything around us came from. I like to strongly push the scientific answer. We have evidence. We no longer have to rely on stories we were told when we were young.

Nothing could be more irrational than the idea that something comes from nothing.

Nothing can be born of nothing; nothing can be resolved into nothing.

You have to stop thinking logically to argue that the universe came into being by itself, out of nothing.