You will be better advised to watch what we do instead of what we say.
Peter Schweizer's book, Clinton Cash, is not discredited. It has been quoted on the front page of the New York Times and the Washington Post.
If there's something you really want to believe, that's what you should question the most.
Believing absolutely everything that appears in print.
Snowden has yet to tell me anything that was a fact that I have been able to rebut or that anybody in the U.S. government I have talked to has been able to rebut.
I have taken special interest in these accounts [of UFOs].. I think there may be substance to some of these reports... I think we owe it to the people to establish credibility regarding UFOs and to produce the greatest possible enlightenment on this subject.
As I understand it, Lacey has dismissed all of the fact checkers.
It wouldn't happen... There hasn't been one publication by a monkey
In terms of threshold, as long as it's based in reality, you can go pretty far, as long as you buy that it's really happening.
If I see something dubious, say on a blog or a Web site, and I don't see it anywhere else, I'll just go right to the source and check it out.
What we are fed through the media I do not accept, unless you see it with your own eyes you cant trust anything.
I don't know if there is some psychological thing of wanting to know where your doctor got his degree from before he comes into the medical room.
Just because something is typed-whether it is typed on a business card or typed in a newspaper or book-this does not mean that it is true.
I do get a lot of offers for endorsing a brand, but for me, the credibility of the brand matters the most.
I deal with first-hand sources. And give the people, even John Sununu, the opportunity to respond to what I've been told by first-hand sources.
Judge countries by their performance …, not by their words
The civilized man has a moral obligation to be skeptical, to demand the credentials of all statements that claim to be facts.
Don't you believe what you read.
It's irresponsible to put uncorroborated information on the Internet.
Everywhere you go you hear things that are untrue. You've just got to learn that if I don't say it, physically out of my mouth, on camera, it's not true.
Who cares if a movie star has an opinion unless the person is very well informed?
And they asked me to take a polygraph as to the allegations and reports I'd made. I volunteered and I took the polygraph and passed it without a glitch.
The credibility of a newspaper or news magazine is essential so you can check it for accuracy. I'm not saying it's not valuable. One can make a case for just running everything. Just run it! That's one of the advantages of the web, you can run everything - but you don't help the reader find out what's important.
Opinion has a significance proportioned to the sources that sustain it.
I never believe anything in the world of entertainment until it actually happens and the check clears the bank.
