On grass, many players can be dangerous because one break can decide a whole set.
[In the modern game] you're either a clay court specialist, a grass court specialist or a hard court specialist... or you're Roger Federer...
We love to play on clay.
Everybody knows I'm not a clay-court specialist. I'm not feeling so well on this surface.
Balls should be good for at least six sets, and for more for the average player. But if the rallies are long, they do not last as long as this. There is a fuzz on the surface that wears off on the hard court.
I'm feeling good about my movement on grass courts; I can serve a little bit better. This makes me much more dangerous than on hard.
Nadal is just more at home on clay. It looks like he feels safer on clay courts. He can get to a few more balls, he can play a bit further behind the baseline when he defends, and he's also able to get the ball to bounce higher. It's unbelievable.
Just because you win the French Open it doesn't mean you can do well at Wimbledon.
On clay courts I have some weapons to play a good match.