It's just as valuable to curate content as it is to create it.
Curation is everything.
I curate my T.V.-watching quite carefully.
Commercial books don't even get covered. The reason why so many book reviews go out of business is because they cover a lot of stuff that nobody cares about. Imagine if the movie pages covered none of the big movies and all they covered were movies that you couldn't even find in the theater?
TV news is what you want it to be, and if you want it to be different, take a look at what you watch.
For better or worse, editing is what editors are for; and editing is selection and choice of material. That editors newspaper or broadcast can and do abuse this power is beyond doubt, but that is no reason to deny the discretion Congress provided.
I don't have any specific criteria on doing a drama based on where and what country. If I like the storyline, I'll go for it.
I would prefer to write about everything; what else is there? But one must be selective.
The decision of what, when, and how to publish is for editors, not judges.
A great problem of the internet is how to filter information, how to discard what is not relevant or what is silly and to keep only the important information.
I think the great thing about a television set is that it can be turned on and off, and you don't have to watch it if you think it's going to be something that you're not going to like or learn from.
That's the beautiful thing about my show... It's truly different every week. We get to pick and choose. Every morning, the girl from production comes to me with 100 different items, and I go, 'Fake, fake, fake, fake... that's cool.'
I'm an old git now, so I would say this, but television was better when there were less channels. There was more concentration and selection in terms of the output.
I don't have any thoughts on blogs, because I don't read them. I don't read them not out of any principle, but because there are only 24 hours in a day, and I like to read books.
I'm a big fan of editing and keeping only the interesting bits in.
No book includes the entire world. It's limited. And so it doesn't seem like an aesthetic compromise to have to do that. There's so much other material to write about.
Getting out any weekly magazine requires many hours of reading, choosing, discarding, and thinking beyond the obvious.
Because YouTube is focused on a lot of different types of content at the same time, it has many opportunities, and the hardest thing is to figure out which ones you shouldn't do, and focus on the ones you should.
Judge said, what you got in your defense son? Fifty-seven channels and nothing on.
I have to be careful of what TV shows I choose, particularly ones that have commercials in them, because it's going to be a different kind of television show.
Consumers deserve the opportunity to watch their program of choice.
While the scale of our library is certainly attractive to our users, equally important is the quality of the content we provide and our state-of-the-art processing operation that vets every single piece of content that's submitted to ensure only the most suitable content is included.
It's rare that you cut out something that is really good. You screen all of it, and when the audience doesn't respond, you cut out whatever is holding the story down.
There is danger in the concentration of control in the television and radio networks, especially in the large television and radio stations; danger in the concentration of ownership in the press...and danger in the increasing concentration of selection by book publishers and reviewers and by the producers of radio and television programs.
I choose films based on scripts.
