I mean, Eighteen years old is the age of consent in Europe and you can go anywhere and do anything you like. In America, it is dumb. At eighteen you should be able to do anything that you like, except get married.
Attaching the word marriage to the association of same-sex individuals mistakenly presumes that marriage is principally a matter of adult benefits and adult rights. In fact, marriage is principally about the nurturing and development of children. And the successful development of children is critical to the preservation and success of our nation.
He has no right to threaten my boyfriends. I'm eighteen. An adult. I don't need his help. I can threaten my boyfriends myself.
I do not believe that the federal government should treat adults who choose to smoke marijuana as criminals.
The socialist society would have to forbid capitalist acts between consenting adults.
The State insists that, by thus quarantining the general reading public against books not too rugged for grown men and women in order to shield juvenile innocence, it is exercising its power to promote the general welfare. Surely this is to burn the house to roast the pig...The incidence of this enactment is to reduce the adult population of Michigan to reading only what is fit for children.
Adults in a free country should be able to smoke a joint if they want to.
What libertarians assert is simply that differences among normal adults do not imply different fundamental rights.
Nobody wants to feel controlled or treated like a child.
I'd require that every university, public or private, be governed by the constitutional standards regarding freedom of expression and due process. There is no reason for treating adult college students any differently in the university setting than in the outside world.
Libertarians argue that no normal adult has the right to impose choices on other normal adults, except in abnormal circumstances, such as when one person finds another unconscious and administers medical assistance or calls an ambulance.
The power of the state lawfully to control the religious and other activities of children is greater than its power over similar activities of adults
I think the Supreme Court does have the authority, which is not used, to declare a blanket right for all people, all adults.
People who concern themselves with the rights of other adults who engage in consensual acts involving sex, love, and/or eating croissants together are damaged and in pain.
We are always going to put the best interests of kids above the rights, privileges and priorities of adults.
