Tom Cotton Quotes

Privacy and confidentiality have always been among our core values. So the question is how to remain true to them in a changing technological and legal environment

What we've gone through in the last several years has caused some people to question 'Can we trust Microsoft?'

First, the security and privacy of sensitive taxpayer information is absolutely essential.

Businesses and users are going to use technology only if they can trust it.

Efforts to constrain encryption through forms of extraordinary access will inevitably introduce vulnerabilities into the security of consumer products in ways that are likely to have adverse long-term effects on the security, privacy, and civil liberties of citizens.

Businesses that make consumer privacy a point of competitive differentiation will enjoy greater customer loyalty.

With the evolution of information technology, there have emerged new questions, for example, of data and privacy.

The goal of federal regulations should be to promote health and safety, but regulatory enforcement must be balanced with common-sense policies and assistance for businesses.

The consequences of a misstep in a well, while large to the immediate people that live around that well, in the great scheme of things are pretty small, and even to the immediate people around the well, they could be mitigated.

We should be careful not to vilify encryption itself, which is essential for privacy, data security, and global commerce.

We share no data with the government anywhere in the world.

How can government reduce the frequency and the severity of future catastrophes? Companies that have the potential to create significant harm must be required to pay for the costs they inflict, either before or after the fact. Economists agree on this general approach. The problem is in putting such a policy into effect.

Uber has to design for the global platform.

When you read that UBS did not even view parts of its mortgage portfolio as having market risk, it becomes very obvious that a number of firms were not dotting the i's and crossing the t's when it comes to risk management.

We have to provide more visibility, more certainty to the investors and reduce the cost of failure.

The problem of end-to-end encryption isn't just a terrorism issue.

Safety has been my top legislative priority. I'm driven by the idea that safety is really a core function of government.

I have no particular formula for staying private.

Safety is number one at Uber... so we make sure the system is in place so riders get the safest ride possible.

From a counter-intelligence viewpoint, the OPM breach is really scary - but if we continue to see the erosion of purely commercial enterprises, where people lose confidence, the economy falters.

Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from bank operational failures, such as rogue traders, fraudulent sales practices, and cyber risks. Operational risk capital is money or assets that banks have to hold to shield the economy from the consequences of these kinds of failures.

Safety is top priority for us, and all our drivers are fully certified; all of them are checked. Their addresses are checked. Backgrounds are checked. To whatever extent the Indian system makes it possible to check.

We all want safe, secure, private data, but we also want safe and secure communities. And we can have both. I really do believe that.

Many casinos in the United States already use facial recognition software to identify undesirables, apparently with a fair degree of success.

It's O.K. if you've got a smartphone app or a social network, and you go live with it before it's ready; people aren't going to die. But with medicine, it's different.