Ayaz Mutalibov Quotes

When we are reproached with having established a dictatorship of one party... we say, ‘Yes, it is a dictatorship of one party! This is what we stand for and we shall not shift from that position...

In inner-party politics, these methods lead, as we shall yet see, to this: the party organization substitutes itself for the party, the central committee substitutes itself for the organization, and, finally, a "dictator" substitutes himself for the central committee.

Dictators are interesting, no?

The term Party is applied equally to the peaceful parties of America and to the Communist Party of Russia, the Nazi Party of Germany, and the Fascist Party of Italy. The methodology of these parties varies, but their fundamental objective-to place and keep their leaders in control of the government - is the same.

Theodore Roosevelt is following the footsteps of Julius Caesar and Napoleon Bonaparte, and unless we stop him it will be but a question of time when he usurps a dictatorship of the American people.

Those republics which in time of danger cannot resort to a dictatorship, or some similar authority, will generally be ruined when grave emergencies occur.

Finance capital curtails democratic rights, narrowing the scope of democracy and paving the way for the open and violent dictatorship of fascist rule.

When we are reproached for exercising the dictatorship of party, we say, yes ... We stand by it and cannot do without it.

In times of crisis, we should have a period of 6 months of dictatorship to straighten things up, then return to democracy.

In every Revolution a dictator is needed to save the state by force, or censors to save it by virtue.

To a certain extent, all dictatorships are alike. From Stalin's Soviet Union to Mao's China, from Ceauşescu's Romania to Saddam Hussein's Iraq, all these regimes had the same trappings ... But Kim Il-sung took the cult of personality to a new level. What distinguished him in the rogues' gallery of twentieth-century dictators was his ability to harness the power of faith. Kim Il-sung understood the power of religion.

All [political] parties, without exception, when they seek for power, are varieties of absolutism.

At times it is necessary for a country to have, for a time, some form or other of dictatorial power..

Every socialist is a disguised dictator.

Every one of the world's dictatorships can and does claim to be acting in the name of the people.

They have been talking about a dictatorship and they were right because there's a dictatorship and there's a government that has been fighting that dictatorship, the dictatorship of the media.

We decline the claim to power by parties which want to own their followers body and soul, and which want to put themselves over and above the whole nation.

There are examples of fraternal dictatorships, or one, anyway: the passing of power from Fidel to Raul Castro.

I am a socialist, so I am not worried about socialism. I am worried about dictators who are putting everyone into a socialist state for their own benefit.

Saddam, as most tyrants, was a total control freak. He wanted total control of his regime. Total control of the country. And to introduce a wild card like Al Qaeda in any sense was just something he would not do.

If the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.

'The End of America' details the 10 steps that would-be dictators always take in seeking to close an open society; it argued that the Bush administration had been advancing each one.

Today we have in this country the abuses of a military dictation without its unity of action and vigor of execution.

From this day the presidency of Mexico ends. The dictatorship of Mexico begins.

Ideas are dangerous; and the traffic in them has been the concern of all dictators.