Manmohan Singh Quotes

We need the private sector to create jobs. If the government could create jobs Communism would have worked, but it didn't.

I'm a liberal, but I think there's so much that the private sector can do and does do.

I am not someone who tends to advocate for increased government involvement in the private sector.

The private sector can only be a supplement to the state and collective sectors, and it can never predominate.

In a mixed economy the public sector remains constrained by the overarching requirement of maintaining an efficient and profitable private sector.

As conservatives, we support free market principles and believe the private sector provides solutions that the government cannot.

I believe that business creates the jobs in this country and not government.

I understand fully that jobs are created by the private sector, having been all my life in the private sector, but I don't buy the argument that the state has no role to play.

Conservatives brayed that government should stay out of the private sector; liberals bleated for nationalizing the banks.

I think the market driven economic system is the most productive system, but to have that work in the world, you've got to also have social investments to go along with that.

Yes, I think India's economy always has been a mixed economy, and by Western standards we are much more of a market economy than a public sector-driven economy.

Jobs are created in the private sector. Not by the president or the government unless they're government jobs.

If you look at the fact that the best chance we have for a good economy is the private sector. The government cannot create jobs. If the government could create jobs, then Communism would have worked. But didn't work. So what we have to do is allow the private sector and the entrepreneurial spirit to lead us back to a job-filled recovery.

Conservatives may worship Adam Smith's 'invisible hand,' but for Obama, the helping hand comes in large measure from the public, not the private sector. To call this 'socialism' is to do violence to the word and to the concept. To call it 'un-American' is a smear.

If anyone will study the causes of retarded recuperation in Europe, he will find much of it due to stifling of private initiative on one hand, and overloading of the government with business on the other.

I do not believe in government ownership of anything which can with propriety be left in private hands, and in particular I should most strenuously object to government ownership of railroads. In my judgment public ownership of railroads is highly undesirable and would probably in this country entail far-reaching disaster.

The government’s role is to motivate the private sector, to assure that it performs in a way which serves the public interest.

It's not coincidental that America's vigorous recovery in the early 1980s was led by a president who worked hard to unshackle growth in the private sector.

Trust in our economic system and the genius and hard work of our citizens beyond the mandate and control of government.

We are turning all Bolivians into capitalists.

President Obama's assault on the free-enterprise market and venture capitalists is anti-American and shows his greatest insecurity: his lack of private sector experience and his inability to understand the economy and help businesses thrive in these uncertain economic times.

Well, the truth is that anybody who is a Conservative knows that the way you generate wealth and ultimately all the taxes that pay for public services is through business, people coming together to make something of their lives and to create jobs.

Government can't create wealth, but it can create the conditions for private enterprise to flourish.

I think most of us in America understand that people, not the government, creates jobs.

One might have thought that the most significant change in the film industry that would come about with a transition from the communist economy to capitalism would fundamentally concern the sources of funding.