Pamela Geller Quotes

The truth is that anyone... that wants to subvert our Constitution to Shariah Law is an enemy of the United States.

I would have to have people totally committed to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of this United States. And many of the Muslims, they are not totally dedicated to this country. They are not dedicated to our Constitution. Many of them are trying to force Sharia law on the people of this country.

Western governments have completely separated Islam from politics. They have cut off its head and given the rest to us.

The policies and laws executed by the grand mufti in Libya, the long-term agenda in the short-lived Morsi government in Egypt, and by ISIS in its ideal Islamist Ummah are incompatible with the Constitution, period.

If the Muslim is Sharia-compliant, that is in direct conflict with the U.S. Constitution.

Sharia law is completely incompatible with our constitution!

I believe in the Constitution. The Constitution says that government isn't supposed to be infusing religion into our society, and so I asked to have that upheld.

I think its rather peculiar. It's not in keeping with our founding documents, our founding vision. But I'd guess you'd have to ask the Obama administration why they purged all this language from their platform. There sure is a lot of mention of government, so I guess I would put the onus on them to answer why they did all these purges of God.

I do stand in opposition to those who want to implement Sharia and essentially attack the Constitution of the United States.

Part of the Koran is a license for oppression.

While Muslims in Muslim countries, are obligated to uphold the Islamic law of their state, Muslim minorities in the United States are not required either by Islamic law or rationality to uphold Islamic symbols of faith in a secular state, except to the extent permissible within that state.

In Islam, there is no difference between the state and the religion. The religion is the state, the state is the religion

A flag burning Constitutional amendment would rip the fabric of the Constitution at its very center.

We need to understand the difference between freedom of religion - which is absolutely guaranteed and I would fervently defend. Sharia law is politics; it's not religion. If you say that a woman is voluntarily going to be of lesser value than a man, which is in sharia law, can we allow that?

To be clear and unequivocal, I can say that Islamisation is constitutionally banned in Hungary.

Any attempt to single out Islam would be a violation of the Constitution.

Islam and the Constitution are in clear conflict.

If a man wishes to have God recognized in the constitution of our country, let him read the history of the Inquisition, and let him remember that hundreds of millions of men, women, and children have been sacrificed to placate the wrath, or win the approbation of this god.

The Americans who framed our Constitution felt that without freedom of religion no other freedom counted.

The Constitution was never meant to prevent people from praying, it's declared purpose was to protect their freedom to pray

The Constitution cannot protect us unless we protect the Constitution.

I look on that paper (the Constitution) as the most fatal plan that could possibly be conceived to enslave a free people.

Acknowledgment of God is not now, or ever has been, a violation of the US constitution.

The Constitution is the bedrock of all our freedoms; guard and cherish it; keep honor and order in your own house; and the republic will endure.

I believe that adulterers should be stoned to death. I believe that we should cut the hands off of thieves. I believe the Sharia should be implemented in Denmark. Maybe we should change the Christiansborg Palace [the Danish Parliament building] to Muslimsborg to have the flag of Islam flying over the parliament in Denmark. I think this would be very nice.