Buffy Sainte-Marie Quotes

Digital art software has empowered both the painterly side of photographers, and the photographer side of painters.

It was a huge challenge to learn digital painting well enough so that computers don't pop into mind when one sees one.

Photoshop came out of painting, and now it's going back to painting.

I use printers to make prints of the images that I am creating. And I try to have that surface kind of replicated in the painting.

Once an artist explores the vast variety of tools and features available on the great programs, we're hooked.

But in the old days, visual artists used to fall into two distinct categories: those of us who created images with cameras and those of us who applied stuff onto other stuff, with brushes or other tools.

All this stuff was done via FTP but the web has put a really nice user interface on it.

I enjoy doing digital work. I enjoy sculpting digitally. I've had my digital sculptures on covers of the top digital magazines.

I'm impressed by the way some illustrators develop their images on computers, but it's too late for me to start, and I'm still in love with paper and paint and pencils.

Usually when painters use photographs, they enlarge and copy them and simply make a large, boring painting of a large, boring photograph.

I like creating images.

I always saw myself as a multi media artist.

The fact that biological, or 'natural' rules might help in the creation of a computer generated work of art is interesting, but even a wonderful work of art made in this fashion isn't the same as a person, with all his or her experiences and emotions involved, making art.

I had an idea for a technologically advanced luxury watch. I got involved in digital art and neon painting and put on shows of my work.

If you're using a computer as an artist and expressing your personal vision, I think your personal vision comes through.

In the future, you won't buy artists' works; you'll buy software that makes original pieces of 'their' works, or that recreates their way of looking at things. You could buy a Shostakovich box, or you could buy a Brahms box. You might want some Shostakovich slow-movement-like music to be generated. So then you use that box.

Technology adds nothing to art.

The future art historians are going to be software guys who are going to go into the depths of the code to find out what was changed hundreds of years before.

Integral to the orb is our low cost long-range wireless radio data system and a protocol that allows us to send this data over 90% of the US population every 15 minutes throughout the day.

I use the computer as a paintbrush. It enables me to do in hours what would have taken months.

I'm interested in all kinds of pictures, however they are made, with cameras, with paint brushes, with computers, with anything.

We've lost these qualities, these abilities to do something by hand. Some illustrators have it still, but it's just not art. We have photography. We have cameras and computers that do it better and faster.

Drawing on a computer doesn't make any sense to me. It's not intuitive.

No painting is ever not an infinitely reproducible image any more.

In earlier times there was one king and thousands of artists painting his palace. Now you’ve got thousands of artists painting for millions of people.