Stanford University Artificial Intelligence Study Panel Quotes
Machine learning signicantly enhances the ability to predict where and when crimes are more likely to happen and who may commit them.
The panel addressed this fact because the implications for law enforcement, criminal justice and civil liberties are profound. Is an artificial intelligence system that is right most of the time allowable to determine the guilt or innocence of an individual "beyond a reasonable doubt?" Can a computer calculation be sufficient to establish probable cause to get a warrant for a search or seizure?
Artificial Intelligence And Life In 2030: One Hundred Year Study On Artificial Intelligence, Report Of The 2015 Study Panel, September 2016
Sourced by: Eigen's Political and Historical Quotations
More and more scientific researchers and technologists were using research tools that they did not fully understand and sometimes did not understand at all.
Fifty years later there would literally be hundreds of millions of computers in the world each one of which computed more things about the affairs of people than all the computers in the entire world were capable of when Bush wrote this.
Mulcts were fines. This was the then common view of educated people regarding the criminal justice system and what we would consider today as barbarous punishments. Note the view that those who had money should pay fines for some crimes but those without money should have their bodies mutilated for the same crimes.
The seventeen-member Study Panel, comprised of experts in AI from academia, corporate laboratories and industry, and AI-savvy scholars in law, political science, policy, and economics, was launched in mid-fall 2015. The participants represent diverse specialties and geographic regions, genders, and career stages.