Stanford University Artificial Intelligence Study Panel Quotes
As AI applications engage in behavior that, were it done by a human, would constitute a crime, courts and other legal actors will have to puzzle through whom to hold accountable and on what theory.
Artificial Intelligence And Life In 2030: One Hundred Year Study On Artificial Intelligence, Report Of The 2015 Study Panel, September 2016
Sourced by: Eigen's Political and Historical Quotations
The panel addressed this fact because the implications for law enforcement, criminal justice and civil liberties are profound. Is an artificial intelligence system that is right most of the time allowable to determine the guilt or innocence of an individual "beyond a reasonable doubt?" Can a computer calculation be sufficient to establish probable cause to get a warrant for a search or seizure?
First use of the term robot to indicate an artificial human.
He was one of the fathers of modern computer science and the first serious programmer. Before there were computers generally available, he had programmed special IBM machines to crack the German’s “uncrackable” Enigma code.
In the1969 mission to the moon, the lunar module control computer flashed a Program Alarm warning message, and the Mission Control officer Steve Bates, with less than 30 seconds to go, had to make a decision whether to abort the module landing or continue. He spoke to Garman, who concluded that since the message did not repeat, that the message was most likely a spurious message—a false alarm. German told him to go ahead when most others wanted to abort. As Garman was the most familiar staff member with the software, Bates followed his lead and continued the landing. Garman was right and he became known as “The Man who saved the Moon Landing”.
Musk was one of the very few technilogical leaders who had great fear about the potential danger of artifical intelligence and thought that it should be regulated.
Musk is one of the very few and earliest technological leaders who spoke out about the potential danger of artificial intelligence and thought it should be regulated.
The seventeen-member Study Panel, comprised of experts in AI from academia, corporate laboratories and industry, and AI-savvy scholars in law, political science, policy, and economics, was launched in mid-fall 2015. The participants represent diverse specialties and geographic regions, genders, and career stages.
