Rush Limbaugh Quotes

If the Liberal Left can create the common perception that success and failure are simple matters of 'fortune' or 'luck,' then it is easy to promote and justify their various income redistribution schemes.

I think when you spread the wealth around it's good for everybody.

Well, I don't care for Paul Ryan's sound or his lyrics. He can like whatever bands he wants, but his guiding vision of shifting revenue more radically to the one percent is antithetical to the message of Rage.

I am still a socialist. I am a left-of-center politician. I believe that in Africa, if you see the poverty around us, you can't afford to be anything else.

The tactics of Saul Alinsky and Barack Obama are geared toward wealth redistribution.

Just as we should never balance the budget on the backs of the poor, so it is an economic delusion to think you can balance it only on the wallets of the rich.

The New Deal was going to redistribute the national income according to ideals of social and economic justice.

Government has got to work for all of us and not just for a few billionaires..

For the good of Spain, I should like there to be rather fewer rich people and rather fewer poor.

Democracy must knock the rough edges off capitalism so that capitalism is safe for everyone and not just the big boys.

The distribution of wealth is just as important as its creation.

We are all socialists now.

It's not class warfare to talk about fairness.

I think democratic socialism will ultimately prevail in this country because it makes an enormous amount of sense.

We aim to restore our focus on building an economy in which all South Africans can flourish, an economy which benefits the people as a whole rather than a privileged few.

Creating wealth is not an end in itself. It needs to be shared by all.

Contemporary social democracy is what I believe is the right concept.

Let the amelioration in our laws of property proceed from the concession of the rich, not from the grasping of the poor. Let us understand that the equitable rule is, that no one should take more than his share, let him be ever so rich.

Imagine what would happen if the government were to take the wealth of 200,000 of India's richest people and redistribute it amongst 2 million of India's poorest? We would hear a lot about socialist appropriation and the death of democracy. Why should taking from the rich be called appropriation and taking from the poor be called development?

The Tenth Commandment sends a message to socialists, to egalitarians, to people obsessed with fairness, to American presidential candidates in the year 2000 - to everyone who believes that wealth should be redistributed. And that message is clear and concise: Go to Hell.

The Left is not interested in prosperity, it is interested in equality

Liberals like to achieve fairness by spreading the misery. Conservatives seek to expand opportunity.

Obama is playing to the lowest common denominator of everybody, and he is telling them that if anybody's got more money than you do, it's not fair and it's unjustified and somehow you have been ripped off or screwed, and that is his message.

I actually believe in redistribution (of wealth)

The issue is Socialism versus Capitalism. I am for Socialism because I am for humanity. We have been cursed with the reign of gold long enough. Money constitutes no proper basis of civilization. The time has come to regenerate society - we are on the eve of universal change.