Louis Navellier Quotes

The stock prices of networking equipment companies like Cisco Systems and Nortel Networks sometimes seem as if they are priced for perpetual success.

The goal seems to me at times just to be business first.

Netflix is a better company with more upside than we had given it credit for than when we shorted it.

Della Valle is worried about RCS? RCS is a company that is doing well; I don't think that Della Valle is worried about this.

The stock market clearly values companies that can deliver disruptive innovation.

By doing what they must do to keep their margins strong and their stock price healthy, every company paves the way for its own disruption.

Our goal is to make General Motors the most valuable automotive company. Clearly, that is having sustainable profitability and driving great returns for our shareholders.

My guess is that Apple won't just pass Microsoft in market capitalization, but will go way beyond it.

I found an approach to investing that made enormous sense to me: rigorously analyzing a company's fundamentals, understanding exactly how it makes money, developing a view on the business's future prospects, and deciding if it's a good business.

The more evident it is that a certain company is going to become the market leader in a big market space, then the higher the valuation goes because the risk has been dramatically reduced.

If we take care of the customers and associates and grow the business, Wall Street will be pleased.

PepsiCo is a $63 billion company. Half the company is snacks, and half the company is beverages. We have a glorious snacks business and a glorious beverage business. We are extremely profitable. We are growing.

With a private company, you've got to get into who's investing and what's the balance sheet like. So going public is a positive thing from the perspective of the sales organization.

I have almost no interest in quarterly reports. Running a business or investing in a business based on quarterly earnings doesn't make any sense at all to me.

Cerner has significant growth opportunities. We believe there is leverage with HNA Millennium and in our business model that can grow both our top-line and earnings during 2000 and through the foreseeable part of this decade.

There's no evidence that large, diversified food companies win over time.

I'm in a business where no one cares about anything except how well your last collection sold.

If you have a business that isn't growing the top line, it's very hard to deliver attractive returns to shareholders.

If you think the job of a CEO is to increase sales, then Ballmer did a spectacular job.

We absolutely take no decisions based on the share price, not for LVMH.

Whether you stay private or go public, after all is said and done, a CEO's job is to create lasting shareholder value.

When we do an investment, we always ask, 'Can we affect the outcome? When buying a company, can we have an impact?' That's a different style of investing than a passive investor in the stock market. To me, that's how you're taking the risk out of it. You know what your capability is and how you can enhance value.

I'm a shareholder in Microsoft Corp. of some size, and while I don't work for the place anymore, I think a lot about that investment, how - as an outsider - might I add value or not add value? Do I believe that things are headed in a good direction? So I wouldn't say I spend the majority of my time on that, but I spend some time on that as well.

Once in a blue moon, an entire industry is a good short.

Investors tend to avoid food companies.