Naveen Tewari Quotes

The public should have access to unfettered communication and commerce, and the Internet is increasingly the medium where that takes place.

I am in favor of complete freedom of information and of free access to the new communication tools, in particular the Internet.

In Russia, they do not generally block the Internet and directly censor websites.

Washington faces a simple choice: allow the Internet to remain as an engine of innovation, a platform for speech in even the harshest tyrannies, and a unified connection for people across the globe—or cede control of the Internet to service providers motivated by their parochial interests.

Without net neutrality protections, the Internet would no longer be a free and open ecosystem for innovation.

The Internet is fundamentally free, and when faced with the decision to use something free, we, as humans, always seek to grab all we can.

The web's earliest architects and pioneers fought for their vision of freedom on the Internet at a time when it was still small forums for conversation and text-based gaming. They thought the web could be adequately governed by its users without their needing to empower anyone to police it.

I support a free and open Internet.

The most important thing to remember here is that the Internet is not broken, and all of the innovation that we've seen since inception has been based on it being free and open.

The Internet eco-system should be such that users should not pay for Internet connection, content, or anything that is basic.

I think we should not control the Internet.

Internet freedom is a bit of a Rorschach test: it means different things to different people.

We need to make Net Neutrality the law. We need to elect a Congress that will make it a priority to keep this important principal intact - and insure equal and open access to the Internet for all.

The core problem is that the world is full of people who would like to take 99 per cent of the information that's on the Internet, and eliminate 1 per cent. Everyone has their own thing they don't like.

The most important thing for people to understand is that the basic rule that people have a right to send information over the Internet - even when they are using a wireless device - is part of the framework.

Google's entire business model and its planning for the future are banking on an open and free Internet. And it will not succeed if the Internet becomes overly balkanized.

A free and open Internet should not have to be weighed down by legal challenges - its dynamism is essential to our economy.

As the web becomes more and more of a part of our every day lives, it would be a horrible tragedy if it was locked up inside of companies and proprietary software.

Let's not let the government sell us out. Let's fight for net neutrality.

I want to preserve the free and open Internet - the experience that most users and entrepreneurs have come to expect and enjoy today and that has unleashed impressive innovation, job creation, and investment.

The only way the Internet will continue to remain the thriving medium it has become today is to keep it under the control of the United States.

Free is not going to go away. Either the advertising model will still work, or there will still be literally hundreds of millions of people who want to put their information on the Net and want people to have access to it.

The Internet in the 21st Century is as important to our future as highways were in the 20th Century. Like a highway, the Internet must remain free and open for all - not determined by the highest bidders.

Both the American people and nations that censor the internet should understand that our government is committed to helping promote internet freedom.

A utopian future for the Internet could be secured if the heavy-duty influencers - and the grassroots influencers tweeting along - can create a new global organization peopled with defenders of Internet freedom.