Marvin Ammori Quotes

Net Neutrality is what makes the Internet so great - and so vital for innovation and creativity.

From day one, the Internet was a public square, and the providers merely connected everyone, rather than regulating who spoke with whom. That allowed the Internet to evolve into a form of basic infrastructure, used by over a billion people today.

Even though the Internet touches every part of our lives, one person is to blame for potentially destroying its potential for innovation and freedom of expression: former FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski.

The most important thing to remember here is that the Internet is not broken, and all of the innovation that we've seen since inception has been based on it being free and open.

A free and open Internet is a despot's worst enemy.

I think we should not control the Internet.

The war for the Internet has begun. Hollywood is in control of politics. The government is killing innovation.

The Internet freedom issue we need to focus on is network neutrality.

One of the great debates about the Internet is whether it is making people more or less free.

The Internet should be an open platform where you are free to go where you want and say and do what you want without having to ask anyone's permission.

The important thing to remember with the Internet is that there are large companies that have an interest in controlling how information flows in it. They're very effective at lobbying Congress, and that pattern has locked down other communication media in the past. And it will happen again unless we do something about it.

Net neutrality is such an important principle for the Web and for the Internet. It's how the Internet's operated for all this time.

The only way the Internet will continue to remain the thriving medium it has become today is to keep it under the control of the United States.

In Russia, they do not generally block the Internet and directly censor websites.

The Internet is uncontrollable. And if the Internet is uncontrollable, freedom will win. It’s as simple as that

We think of the Internet as a bottom-up phenomenon. There are people and countries that would like to treat it as a top-down institution; Americans resist that and I think rightfully so. It would cramp our style in terms of creativity, innovation, and so forth.

Over the course of a year - from January 2014 to March 2015 - millions of Americans, hundreds of businesses, and dozens of policymakers weighed in at the Federal Communications Commission in favor of net neutrality.

There are massive efforts on the part of the internet's corporate owners to try to direct it to become a technique of marginalisation and control.

To go back to a 1950s voice mentality with Title II and net neutrality would be a tremendous mistake for our country.

The FCC sided with the public and adopted extremely strong net neutrality rules that should be a global model for Internet freedom.

I support a free and open Internet.

Net-neutrality proponents howled when Comcast started throttling traffic from BitTorrent, a bandwidth-hogging program people use to swap video files. The Federal Communications Commission sided with the open-Internet folks, ruling that Comcast could not selectively choke off traffic.

The net is a very precious thing. I hate it when people discuss measures to limit it.

Even with censorship, the Internet is a force for change.

Internet freedom is a bit of a Rorschach test: it means different things to different people.