Hillary Clinton Quotes

The Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons would be infinitely more costly than any scenario you can imagine to stop it.

When the President of Iran talks about removing Israel from the face of the Earth and is building nuclear bombs with a range of 3000km, you have to be worried.

I don't think that Iran with a nuclear capability will be just the problem of the state of Israel. This is a matter that concerns the whole world.

The greatest threat that the world faces is a nuclear Iran. A nuclear North Korea is already troubling enough.

If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, its influence and that of Hamas and Hezbollah are strengthened.

What could become a danger to world peace is Iran's nuclear program and the country's open threat to annihilate Israel.

But I really believe it is in America's interest as well as that of the free world more generally to stop Iran from getting its hands on nuclear weapons. This regime has threatened to wipe Israel off the map and bring about a world without America, and either of those is a really bad prospect.

The biggest problem that we have on the face of the planet is Iran getting a nuclear weapon.

If Iran gets nuclear weapons we are near to the apocalypse.

The Russians and the Chinese have been absolutely clear they don't want to see Iran with a nuclear weapon.

Iran with a nuclear weapon or with fissile material that can be given to Hezbollah or Hamas or others has the potential of not just destabilizing the Middle East. But it could be brought here.

If Iran gains a nuclear weapon, we will need a new calendar in the world - it would change humanity that much. Iran will give these weapons to terrorists the world over, and your children and mine will step into the shadow of nuclear terrorism.

The world should contemplate a nuclear weapons-armed Iran with the greatest of concern.

The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery is a threat to both the Nato allies and Russia.

I think that Iran with a nuclear weapon is extremely destabilizing. I think it could precipitate a nuclear arms race in the region.

Nuclear weapons are infinitely less important in our foreign policy than they were in the days of the Cold War. I don't think we need nuclear weapons any longer.

Iran's continued pursuit of nuclear weapons, support for international terrorist organizations, and abhorrent human rights practices pose one of the greatest threats to global security.

I wouldn't discount the possibility that the Israelis would act if they came to the conclusion that basically the world was prepared to live with Iran with nuclear weapons. They certainly have the capability by themselves to set back the Iranian nuclear program.

The larger picture here is that a North Korea with nuclear weapons adds to the larger proliferation risk.

The development of weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to carry them would be a very destabilizing effect, should Iran be able to accomplish that.

The two biggest threats to international security in 2013 are Iran getting a nuclear weapon, and Iran being bombed to stop it getting a nuclear weapon. Both would precipitate a long and dangerous conflict in an already unstable Middle East. Both would be a disaster.

For while the threat of nuclear holocaust has been significantly reduced, the world remains a very unsettled and dangerous place.

There is only one thing worse than one nation having the atomic bomb -- that's two nations having it.

The goal [of disarmament] is no longer a dream. It is a practical matter of life or death. The risks inherent in disarmament pale in comparison to the risks inherent in an unlimited arms race...

Israel’s development of nuclear capability would be a cause for war, no matter how suicidal it would be for us.