Nouriel Roubini Quotes
A currency serves three functions: providing a means of payment, a unit of account and a store of value. Gold may be a store of value for wealth, but it is not a means of payment. You cannot pay for your groceries with it. Nor is it a unit of account. Prices of goods and services, and of financial assets, are not denominated in gold terms.
Roubini, Nouriel. "The Gold Routing." Project Syndicate, 1 June 2013.
This is the first major history of banks written in the United States.
There has always been a fear of inflation and currency debasement by governments. Since ancient times, rulers issued coins and when they were made of cheap metals like copper or iron, the ruler could mint as much as he wanted and when he did so the value went down. By using only precious metals, gold and silver, for coins, there would be a natural restraint on government. Garfield was one of those who believed that we should always have money of gold and silver. The United States would use that principle for the next century even backing its paper money with gold and silver. In the Nixon administration the United States abandoned the gold standard. Today, it is the ability of a country to produce things that maintains value of paper money which has been supplanted in many cases by electronic money.
Economists they world over have differed as to how critical it was to have a money supply that is based on a gold standard or other precious metal. United States history has had a dispute over whether the money should be backed by gold or silver. Finally, under the Richard M. Nixon administration, the United States went off the gold standard and American money ever since is only backed by the ‘full faith and credit’ of the United States. Some politicians like Paul believe this is a poor policy since it allows governments to control their own money supply irrespective of their gold or silver holdings. Paul goes further than most and sees freedom itself dependent on a precious metal standard. Most politicians disagree.
At the time, there was no United States currency. Private banks in some of the states issued their own money. A dollar from Georgia might only be worth 75 cents in New York.
The same argument can be made against the modern paper money supply. What Jefferson and most of the founding fathers, with the exception of Alexander Hamilton. did not realize was that the major stability of any kind of money was not only the silver or gold that backed it but the political and legal stability of the nation and the size of its productive economy. Where Jefferson was right however is that all these banknotes at the time were issued by local private banks. The Government had no responsibility for paper money and had no knowledge of how much paper money any bank issues and whether or not they had any silver to back it up. Banks didn’t trust other bank’s notes and would only redeem them at a discount. A $10 note from a South Carolina bank might only be worth $7 in New York and $6 in Boston. The early American monetary system was a mess.
The very act of printing money created a debt—at the time and until the Nixon Administration which went off the gold standard—the government owed the gold or silver and the spicie—the printed money—was a promissory note.
Nouriel Roubini is an American economist. He teaches at New York University's Stern School of Business and is chairman of Roubini Macro Associates LLC, an economic consultancy firm.
