MARY DOUGLAS

What did our nation ever do to provoke these madly vicious enemies? What is seen as injustice in one place is seen as just requital in the other.

Enclave life becomes very tense, Even when they do elect a leader, the factions remain, with the threat of splitting off.

Behind a leader there must be followers, but they should always be on the lookout for the main chance and ready to change sides if the current leader doesn't deliver.

Inequality can have a bad downside, but equality, for its part, sure does get in the way of coordination.

Without that assured American largesse Israel would have been obliged to come to an accommodation with her neighbours.

It's unlikely that the organized religions will get more sectarian... or is it? I am not at all sure.

It is very reasonable to worry about the harm done by organized religion, and to prefer looser and more private arrangements.

It is only partly true that religion does more harm than good in society. The community makes God into the image it wants, vengeful, or milky sweet, or scrupulously just, and so on.

Since 1970, relationships can be more volatile, jobs more ephemeral, geographical mobility more intensified, stability of marriage weaker.

An escalating, violent tit-for-tat may lead to terrorism.

Just in our lifetime our society has become looser and more private, it becomes extremely difficult to hold to any permanent commitment whatever, least of all to organized religion.

Every year the progress of advanced capitalist society makes our population consist of more and more isolates. This is because of the infrastructure of the economy, especially electronic communications.

I am convinced that living in an enclave shapes the personality, and living alone shapes the personality too.

Our technological infrastructure alienates us from each other. No need to form a workplace community, everybody there will be out in a year or two, and so will you, looking for a better place.

Some scholars have been arguing that a civilizational clash between organized religions is the next step in human history.

I am sure it must be true that people opt out of the mainstream society because they feel that there are going to be no rewards for them, if they stay.

Pretensions to moral superiority are devastatingly destructive.

The natural response of the old-timers is to build a strong moral wall against the outside. This is where the world starts to be painted in black and white, saints inside, and sinners outside the wall.

Real equality is immensely difficult to achieve, it needs continual revision and monitoring of distributions. And it does not provide buffers between members, so they are continually colliding or frustrating each other.

Mormons... are so strong, they can handle wealth, they are confident. I think it is because they are not bogged down by rules for equality, but have a firmly defined system of relative status and responsible command.

Inside a religious body you get sects and hierarchies, inside an information network you get bazaars and cathedrals, it is the same, call them what you like. They survive by pointing the finger of blame at each other.

Hierarchy works well in a stable environment.

I have increasingly, over the years, felt that religion today does our civilization more harm than good.

When we are reflecting on terrorism we can grieve for many things we do and have done.

Religion can make it worse. Are you supposing that if people were encouraged to believe in a transcendent reality, and to be encouraged by grand rituals and music and preaching, to love their neighbors, then they would put jealousy and frustration aside?