Photography concentrates one's eye on the superficial. For that reason it obscures the hidden life which glimmers through the outlines of things like a play of light and shade. One can't catch that even with the sharpest lens.
I think CGI is interesting, but it's too expensive and limiting in terms of what you can do shot-by-shot.
I was completely astonished by the beauty of nature. Our eyes see just a small fraction of the light in the world. It is a trick to make a colored world, which does not exist outside of human beings.
We have all kinds of limitations as human beings. I mean we can't see the whole electromagnetic spectrum; we can't see the very small; we can't see the very far. So we compensate for these short comings with technological scaffoldings. The microscope allows us to extend our vision into the micro-sphere.
I don't look at fashion shows on the internet because it's too flat.
There were challenges with production because of the special effects. There are just some things that, although written, special effects just isn't able to do.
You can't see fear or lust; you can't photograph someone's anxieties, how disappointment feels. Photographs are approximations.
The Internet is fascinating but also stupid in a way. You only see two-dimensional images, and you think you've seen it and know it.
