Security Framework Quotes

It is insufficient to protect ourselves with laws; we need to protect ourselves with mathematics.

As long as NATO changes when the world is changing, we will be very important for the security of all our allies, including the United States.

The United States has been unable to create a post-Cold War security architecture in which Russia feels it has a stake.

A collective security relies on everybody doing their fair share.

The security of which we speak is to be attained by the development of international law through an international organization based on the principles of law and justice.

The United Nations, and the way we approach collective security, must be adapted to changing circumstances. The United Nations is our prime instrument for effective multilateral solutions and a rule-based international order.

Our approach [to global security] has changed by the way we've elevated development. The biggest lesson is to recognize global responsibility.

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

The clever, albeit fragile, coalition against terrorism brought together by the U.S. government might be able to advance the transition from classical international law to a cosmopolitan order.

Security today is important, but 90 percent of security involves other co functions of government.

Since arriving in Washington in January 2015, I have pushed for a strategic framework that clearly articulates how we'll tackle threats in cyberspace.

In my view, America has never had the opportunity to enter paradise. Europe enjoys the paradise it enjoys, in part because the United States provides the overall security that allows Europe to live in a system where military power is not a major issue.

Britain is committed to peace and security, and a leading supporter of the international rules-based system.

The international rules-based order in the wake of World War II is the order that has ensured prosperity and security now for 75 years. I'm fully committed to that.

It was immediately clear to me that security was a cross-cutting issue, so rather than dividing the space up in parallel with each of the other areas, I wanted security cut across the areas in addition to having its own content.

Different regions may require different strategies, as President Bush has noted, but not different basic principles. It's either collective security or selective security.