We promise that the events of 1991 will not happen again. We have pledged to remove Saddam. And we will deliver.
We've thrown out Saddam and Saddam, dead or alive, is finished in Iraq.
I think we've, again, got to be extremely careful; otherwise we'll misunderstand what's going on in Iraq and in Syria today. Of course, you can't say that those of us who removed Saddam in 2003 bear no responsibility for the situation in 2015.
My point was that removing Saddam should not have been our highest priority. Fighting terrorism should have been our number one concern, followed by the Palestinian peace process.
Saddam's removal is necessary to eradicate the threat from his weapons of mass destruction
And the problem is, I can apologise for the information that turned out to be wrong, but I can't, sincerely at least, apologise for removing Saddam.
We can remove Saddam because that could start a chain reaction in the Arab world that would be very healthy.
Whether or not Saddam is implicated directly in the anthrax attacks or the horrors of September 11, he is, by any common definition, a terrorist who must be removed.
I did more than anyone else in persuading the U.S. to get rid of Saddam.
The absence of Saddam is a huge weight off the Arab world.
We are safer, the region is safer, the world is safer without Saddam.
