If a man speaks his mind in a forest, and no woman hears him, is he still wrong?
All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.
We all have our opinions. But I suspect that writers are actually less worth heeding, because they regard themselves as so uniquely important, so culturally sensitive.
Anybody who believes Yelp is an idiot. Most people on Yelp have no idea what they're talking about.
Opinions can't be inaccurate.
You can have opinions, but it doesn't mean they're right.
Many young people now end a discussion with the supposedly definitive and unanswerable statement that such is their opinion, and their opinion is just as valid as anyone else's. The fact is that our opinion on an infinitely large number of questions is not worth having, because everyone is infinitely ignorant.
The presumption that any current opinion is not wholly false, gains in strength according to the number of its adherents.
You know, an opinion can be right or wrong.
People are usually more firmly convinced that their opinions are precious than that they are true.
I think people always appreciate somebody else's informed educated opinion. To the degree that anybody with a computer can offer a journalistic point of view whether or not they have a degree, it sort of alters the validity of you have to place on anyone's individual comment.
[In a blogosphere] everybody has an opinion now, but I don't really freaking care about - all opinions ain't created equal, because everybody can go out there and express themselves and hide behind some character we don't know who you really are, a bunch of cowards.
The idea that everyone's opinion is valuable is sometimes up for question.
Opinion has a significance proportioned to the sources that sustain it.
As soon as you write about climate change, the first attempt to discredit you is, 'Well, you wrote this on a computer,' or, 'You took a plane to this conference.' So your opinion isn't valid.
