Language Barriers Quotes

× Warning! Listed quotes will be limited to the maximum of 1000 results. Please use the search page and refine your search criteria.


Although Jefferson was a strong immigration enthusiast, he and others were concerned about the ghettoization. The early German immigrants did not universally adopt English, just as today’s immigrants do not all. This was a concern of Americans since the first immigrations. Yet it has always occurred despite concerns about it. However, the second and third generations all become fluent and literate in English.


He was speaking metaphorically here. Literally dreaming in English is not his requirement. What is required is an outlook, perception, value system, and national identity that is American. Lack of English language proficiency makes that much harder to achieve.


This is a complaint similar to that made by anti-immigrant Americans. France, like most other countries of the world, has never had the large scale immigration of today, nor have they had such a large proportion of the same ethnicity at once—in this case, Muslim North Africans. There were never, before the last decades, enough immigrants of any ethnicity in France to have a choice of maintaining their traditional languages and culture and not learning French or otherwise assimilating. America, in contrast, had large immigrations of different ethnicities, and despite the erroneous beliefs of immigration opponents, these blocs of immigrants have wherever there was sufficient density—usually cities, they maintained their old language and other customs. However, their children and the next generation in almost all cases have abandoned the language and many of the customs of the old country. This was true of the Germans, the Irish, the Italians, the European Jews, the Russian Jews, the Scandinavians’, and the Hispanics with their different cultures.


He was interviewed by PBS and asked why he introduced and financed California Proposition 227 the severely limited and curtailed bilingual education. Based on his success getting Proposition 227 passed in California, he tried to follow suit with Arizona Proposition 203, Colorado Amendment 31, and Massachusetts Question 2 which were not so successful. The research on Bilingual Education is mixed with some studies showing benefits and others not. Intuitively, the case against it was easier to sell as the objective was to develop English Proficiency and it was hard for many people to understand how that would better be accomplished if other classes were taught in a native language like Spanish. The other side point out that students who come the the United States very competent in Mathematics, Science and History get thrown into English speaking classes in those subjects and the fall behind very quickly. By the time their English is sufficient to take instruction in English, they have already failed the courses in which they used to be good and have to take them again if they are still in school which is rare since the lack of English skills causes them to fail all subjects if a Bilingual program is not available for their math, science, and history courses. Both sides of the argument have a point, but in many anti-Bilingual campaigns, the educational arguments gets lost and the issue becomes whether or not America should be an English speaking country, and Hispanic chauvinism and anti Hispanic racism end up driving much of the debate.