I think as journalists, we have to keep our distance from power.
I have tried to write about this matter without any improper bias, but of course we are all cowards about newspapers who tyrannize over us all.
I don't think the news department will have to lie down and play dead like it has in the past. By and large the network has been understanding, but then so have I.
Only al-Jazeera is allowed to report from Zimbabwe, but it is unwatchable. Their Zimbabwean reporter Supa Mandiwanzira was one of Zanu-PF's praise-singers at the reviled Zimbabwe Broadcasting Corporation.
People back down because the libel system is so utterly hostile to journalists, bloggers, scientists. The smart thing is not to fight.
I believe a journalist needs to be free to ask the questions he or she deems relevant, without constraints from others.
The fight to get a shield law barring the government from being able to jail journalists is itself a non-partisan battle.
A free press is one of the pillars of democracy.
The press is supposed to serve as a check on government.
Journalism has a special, hallowed place for stories of its practitioners' persecution.
Junk journalism is the evidence of a society that has got at least one thing right, that there should be nobody with the power to dictate where responsible journalism begins
I do believe with all my soul In the gret Press's freedom, To pint the people to the goal And in the traces lead ‘em.
The poem was in a dialect. “Gret” was “great” and “pint” was “point”.
We are all Julian Assange. Serious reporters discuss classified information every day - go to any Washington or New York dinner party where real journalists are present, and you will hear discussion of leaked or classified information. That is journalists' job in a free society.
To all the self-righteous defenders of 'freedom of speech' who oh-so-ardently proclaimed that FARA registration places no restrictions whatsoever on RT's journalistic work in the U.S.: Withdrawal of Congressional credentials speaks much louder than empty platitudes.
More than illness or death, the American journalist fears standing alone against the whim of his owners or the prejudices of his audience. Deprive William Safire of the insignia of the New York Times, and he would have a hard time selling his truths to a weekly broadsheet in suburban Duluth.
As to the journalist himself, it is clear that to get a living he must write to order, that is, he must write in accordance with the views of his paper, in so far as he writes at all on current topics.
A lot of journalists don't want to conflate their own opinions with those of their employers… With a YouTube video, you can be as personal or as journalistic as you want.
For me, in terms of personal satisfaction, the mission's already accomplished. I already won. As soon as the journalists were able to work, everything that I had been trying to do was validated. Because, remember, I didn't want to change society. I wanted to give society a chance to determine if it should change itself.
I think aggressive, sometimes outspoken reporting from the White House briefing room is expected by the American people.
Journalists and everyone in America has a constitutional right to express themselves or write what they want to write.
We do not want to interfere with the freedom of press.
When reporters are in the business of obtaining hard facts that service the free flow of information, journalists should have a right to obtain that information without fear of personal ruin or incarceration.
My job as a reporter, my job as a senior White House correspondent for CNN, is to report the news, but also to highlight and put a microscope on episodes of presidential hypocrisy. And you know, if Donald Trump was going to come after us out on the campaign trail, and as president of the United States through his tweets, I think we are well within our rights to defend ourselves, and also provide that kind of critical coverage to the American people.
Well I think we can't avoid covering the news and when the president says something like that you're the enemy of the people, I think I'm well within my right to stand up and say this is well within my lane as a journalist and as an American to say that that's not appropriate.
I started using my blog to get information about cities I was about to visit, asking followers what the main problems there were. Many mentioned misconduct of politicians and other things I wanted to talk about during my shows. Then, before a show in one city, local politicians called saying they would sue if I said something unpleasant.