Statutes authorizing unreasonable searches were the core concern of the framers of the 4th Amendment.
Trust is not what the framers of the United States constitution and of this country relied on.
If the framers of the Constitution had any way to predict what our society would look like today, they would think it ridiculous to see the proliferation of guns.
Was it the intention of the framers ... to forbid the states to enact and enforce segregation statutes? If one goes to the historical materials with this specific question, the only answer is in the negative. The framers did not intend or expect then and there to outlaw segregation, which, of course, was a practice widely prevalent in the North.
Bickel was then clerk to Justice Frankfurter.
It is necessary to establish the proposition that the [Constitution's] framers' intentions with respect to freedoms are the sole legitimate premise from which constitutional analysis may proceed.
The very inclusion of the right to keep and bear arms in the Bill of Rights shows that the framers of the Constitution considered it an individual right.
The framers of our Constitution didn’t trust unlimited power.
The Framers were no more interested in binding future Americans to a set of divinely inspired commandments than any of us would wish to be bound by them.
The Framers of the Constitution expected the presidency to be occupied by special individuals, selfless people of the highest character and ability. They intended the Electoral College to be a truly deliberative body, not the largely ceremonial institution it has become today.
Patriotic feelings will surely swell, prompting proud proclamations of the wisdom, foresight, and sense of justice shared by the Framers and reflected in a written document now yellowed with age . . . [F]or many Americans the bicentennial celebration will be little more than a blind pilgrimage to the shrine of the original document now stored in a vault in the National Archives. [Progressive]
The framers, in their wisdom, designed the [political] system so that power's pretty disbursed.
If our free society is to endure, those who govern must recognize human dignity and accept the enforcement of constitutional limitations on their power conceived by the Framers . . . . Such recognition will not come from a technical understanding of the organs of government, or the new forms of wealth they administer. It requires something different, something deeper-a personal confrontation with the wellsprings of our society.
As a framer and defender of the Constitution [Madison] had no peer.
If the Constitution framers would come back today, they would have contempt for most of us.
I suspect that the framers of the Bill of Rights have long since rolled over in their graves.
The framers of the Constitution realized that . . . there needed to be some guardian of the sober second thought, and so they created the Senate to fulfill that high and vitally important duty.
The framers knew that liberty is a fragile thing, and so should we.