Archer has a loose-limbed approach in a run-up that is not very long. He gets into a good position at the crease and releases the ball late from a very high action. He snaps the ball down at genuine pace. He has rhythm to his bowling.
In fact, as a spin bowler, you have to work on the batsman over after over.
On the field, MS epitomises calmness and, from a cricket point of view, has the best angle in terms of field placements.
In Twenty20 it's not always about straight drives and high elbows. It's amazing how far you can hit the ball. I've always been able to hit the ball far but not consistently like I have in practice over here. I'm enjoying it so much.
In cricket, you should keep your wrist as straight as possible, unlike golf.
Roland-Jones is a good, old-fashioned English seamer. He's not especially quick, but he pitches the ball up and swings it away, which is always dangerous.
When I bowled to batters like Michael Vaughan or Jacques Kallis who were classical, technically perfect, sound batters, I always found that I could get them out.
Fast bowling is an art, like spin bowling.
I try to keep the ball up to the bat, and I usually get the ball to outswing, so I get wickets like that.
With all my bats I like them to be bottom-heavy, so they help me to hold the line through the shot.
Bumrah has a different action, which creates problems for the batsmen. He has improved a lot of things with his action. He had these yorkers, and slower ones earlier as well, but he has improved a lot.
Growing up, I played on matting wickets. I always enjoyed the pace and bounce and somewhere that has a big role or big effect on your game.
You so often see bowlers pick out a lovely new ball from the bag at nets and it looks great when it swings in the air and nips off the seam with batsmen playing and missing. But you have to simulate match situations. What about when the ball is 60 overs old, the sun is blazing down, the pitch is flat and there's not a hint of movement?
When I play a cover-drive, I play it to score runs.
I don't like to follow someone, but I really like A B de Villiers as a batsman. I think he has got all the strokes and plays according to the situation.
Jacques Rudolph at the moment is using the inside edge as much as the middle of the bat.
If you have knocked over a batsman once - fine, it happens. Twice, OK. But more than that in the space of a few Tests then there is definitely something to work with.
Nothing is easy in cricket. Maybe when you watch it on TV, it looks easy. But it is not. You have to use your brain and time the ball.
Reverse swing is a great asset if it happens.
A batsman's skill and technique are judged on how he faces the Duke ball in England
I rely on swing to get wickets, and I continue to do it that way. I have never tried to copy others.
KL Rahul has the technique for all forms of the game and for me more Test cricket than anything else. And if he performs so well in T20s and the 50-overs game, I think Test cricket is really where he's made for.
It doesn't matter whether you move your feet or not; if your head is still and body is in balance, you can score lots of runs. This I learned from Tendulkar.
I would like to improve my shot selection when it comes to playing short-pitched deliveries.
Within the changing room, everyone has always known I'm best when I pitch the ball up and get a little bit of movement.
