And if you take the cameras out of the courtroom, then you hide, I think, a certain measure of truth from the public, and I think that's very important for the American public to know.
The Supreme Court should televise its proceedings.
I have not fully had the opportunity to evaluate the impact of cameras in the courtroom.
When you have a child victim, I don't think cameras should be in the courtroom, ever.
Proceeding should be televised. There is nothing secret about a trial. It should always be open. I think the Supreme Court is just a little bit stuffy about televising its proceedings.
I think cameras should be in the courtroom, but they need to be managed properly. You need a judge to hold the line.
Cameras in the courtroom is a great idea.
The day you see a camera come into our courtroom, it's going to roll over my dead body.
I know the pundits and the news media have carried a lot of commentary about cameras in the courtroom, and there's a lot of controversy about it as a result of the Simpson case. But I have not had enough time to step back and enough time to evaluate that.
Cameras should be the norm everywhere. It should be in every courtroom so that the proceedings are taken down and recorded just like stenography.
