I'm kind of against car culture - I've always been a cyclist.
I'm of that subset of native New Yorkers who can't drive.
I don't drive. I live in L.A., but I take the bus. I know, I'm weird!
I've run into more people walking in L.A. than if I drove. Because you stand out so much if you walk. People from my past have stopped their cars and said, 'Hey!' But if I was in a car, they never would've seen me.
Because I'm one of five people in Los Angeles who doesn't drive, I walk a lot.
I grew up on the bus, or riding my bike, or catching the subway, I've never had a car. In college, any girl I ever dated had a car, too.
I don't have a motorcar, so I've got to know and be fairly fond of the buses.
Most of the time, I get around perfectly well on my bike and public transportation, even in spite of the Bay Area's almost comically shambolic system.
The goal of mass transit is to convince people to abandon their cars, which feature such enticing accessories as CD players and elbow room.
I like a walking culture; I need to be in a city where you can walk everywhere.
There's a massive opportunity as more and more millennials and others in cities switch over from car ownership to transportation as a service. They are picking Lyft, and we want to stay focused on that big opportunity.
I quit driving, I'm not retired.
Being a pedestrian again is very exciting because in L.A. you live in your car, and you're on a freeway all the time.
I never took the bus. Never. Walking meant you were eccentric or pious or a loser - riding the bus meant you were insane or masochistic and worse than a loser.
I don't ride the subway. Either I walk, or I take a New York City taxi.
I don't have a car and have decided never to own one.
I can't drive, so I can only live in New York, which is fine with me.
Well, you go to Holland and everybody's on a bike - nobody would think to have a car.
