Joe Paterno Quotes

I think people have different definitions of team unity. My definition is doing whatever it takes to win, what makes a great team; it's performance on the field, respect on the field.

When you form a team, why do you try to form a team? Because teamwork builds trust and trust builds speed.

It's hard to find good teamwork in practice, and I have never thought that we, as a party, were any better at working as a team than the Tories, despite our core values.

You can take a team of absolute all-stars in terms of their native abilities, but if they are not working together, they are much less effective than a team where there is less native ability but a higher degree of teamwork and cohesion.

The more you are together as a team, the better you become.

It doesn't matter if you have the best individual players, as you need to have the best team unit.

The rider and the team need to understand one another and work in the same direction. Then the rider's happy, and only then will the rider be able to give 100%.

When you start out in a team, you have to get the teamwork going and then you get something back.

A team may have some great players, but typically, the team that works best together does the best. I look at running Broadcom in the same way. We have a culture where people have different skill sets, but they are happy to leverage their skills to help others and to help the company.

No team works out teamwork.

Teams that consistently perform at the highest levels are able to come together and be unified across the organization - staff, players, coaches, management, and ownership. When everyone is on the same page, trust develops, and teams can grow and succeed together.

I would say for a team to win, you don't need big names. You just need the right pieces.

You can have a bunch of individually good players, but it doesn't matter. You gotta learn to play like a team.

It's not always the best roster that wins, it's the best team, and sometimes that maybe doesn't jell all that well.

Stars don't necessarily make a good team and that is what we must learn.

I have fitted perfectly in the team and in the team's style of play.

Collaboration is an important part of the process, and ego is never a part of it.

I feel like Josh, Michelle and Adam were all team players, who wanted to be a part of an ensemble.

A good team, like a good show, comes into being when the separate individuals working together create, in essence, another separate higher entity - the team - the show - which is better than any of those individuals can ever be on their own.

I mention the need of cooperation and confidence among the men who work, no matter what may be their relative ranks, because it is the vital factor underlying everything. Only as we are willing to work today, work as we never have worked before, will civilization survive.

I played on teams with 24 guys pulling the rope one way and one guy pulling the other. I've seen how destructive it can be. I tell them, 'If 13 of you are insanely successful and one fails, we all lose.'

You know, you can have someone who's the very best at something, but if there's not that kind of chemistry, collaborating is not going to amount to anything.

They have very good individual players, but they need the collective game. And they still do not have it although there are now only six months left to go.

I am too much of a team member to be separated from my team.

I love working with other people and bouncing ideas off them.