Esther Hicks Quotes

I think evil is very relative.

My idea of what's good and bad and right and wrong is maybe greyer than most, and I like writing about that.

Everybody is grappling with their own moral compass, and that needle, like any needle, can't just stick. It's always floating a little bit, and depending on where you're standing, it's hard to read.

So you see, Good and Evil have the same face; it all depends on when they cross the path of each individual human being.

Good and bad are really arbitrary words when it comes to character.

I've learned a lot about good and evil. They are not always what they appear to be.

Because of the diverse conditions of humans, it happens that some acts are virtuous to some individuals … while the same acts are immoral for others …

No villain thinks of himself as a villain, and that's the approach I always take.

Even people that are evil believe what they're doing is good. I don't agree with those people, but it's about understanding that there are those kinds of points of view.

I think most people are indifferent in their evaluation of what is good or bad.

I don't believe so much in good and evil.

There's nothing "wrong" with anything. "Wrong" is a relative term, indicating the opposite of that which you call "right." Yet, what is "right"? Can you be truly objective in these matters? Or are "right" and "wrong" simply descriptions overlaid on events and circumstances by you, out of your decision about them?

Why are we talking about this good and evil? They're just names for sides. We know that.

Moral: It all depends.

The difference is too nice - Where ends the virtue or begins the vice.

Modern morality is all about perception.

There is really no right and wrong. I recognize no right and wrong.

Are right and wrong convertible terms, dependant upon popular opinion?

One and the same thing can at the same time be good, bad, and indifferent, e.g., music is good to the melancholy, bad to those who mourn, and neither good nor bad to the deaf.

What is moral is what you feel good after, and what is immoral is what you feel bad after.

About morals, I know only that what is moral is what you feel good after and what is immoral is what you feel bad after.

I always end up taking people that are morally ambiguous.

Truth is not half way between right and wrong;

'Right' and 'wrong' aren't words a linguist uses.

If you say morality is just what you like, you lose the metaphysical level of what in the history of philosophy is called 'categorical imperative.'