Lotte Verbeek Quotes

There is really no right and wrong. I recognize no right and wrong.

Some things must be good in themselves, else there could be no measure whereby to lay out good and evil.

I like to see the difference between good and evil as kind of like the foul line at a baseball game. It's very thin, it's made of something very flimsy like lime, and if you cross it, it really starts to blur where fair becomes foul and foul becomes fair.

We should not be simply fighting evil in the name of good, but struggling against the certainties of people who claim always to know where good and evil are to be found.

I don't believe in good people and bad people.

Good and bad are really arbitrary words when it comes to character.

I've learned a lot about good and evil. They are not always what they appear to be.

I think evil is very relative.

Right and wrong are not simply matters of evolutionary impacts and what is natural.

We always want to find good and bad guys, and I don't believe in that.

Life is neither good or evil, but only a place for good and evil.

Fantasy is an area where it is possible to talk about right and wrong, good and evil, with a straight face. In mainstream fiction and even in a good deal of mystery, these things are presented as simply two sides of the same coin. Never really more than a matter of where you happen to be standing.

There is no right in acting.

There is no moral precept that does not have something inconvenient about it.

I always end up taking people that are morally ambiguous.

Because of the diverse conditions of humans, it happens that some acts are virtuous to some individuals … while the same acts are immoral for others …

Of God and Evil, there is nothing simply and absolutely so; nor any common Rule of Good and Evil, to be taken from the nature of the objects themselves.

No villain thinks of himself as a villain, and that's the approach I always take.

There are no moral victories.

The world is made up of good and evil, and everybody has their own take, and everybody thinks they are on the good side, and a very few, select group of us will admit that we come from the dark side.

Good and bad are not really relevant to me.

I do like crossing moral boundaries.

Morality must relate, at some level, to the well-being of conscious creatures. If there are more and less effective ways for us to seek happiness and to avoid misery in this world - and there clearly are - then there are right and wrong answers to questions of morality.

What 'True Blood' does really well is that it balances on the line between good and evil - you blur the distinction between the two.

There were certain questions about the foundations of morals that advances in science all threaten to make more complicated.