Neera Tanden Quotes
We had massive tax cuts in the early phases of the [George W.] Bush years… The decade following was the worst growth rate in over 60 years.
She was refuting the claim of many economic conservatives that cutting taxes will always produce economic growth. Actually, in many cases tax cuts do have that effect, but as the counter-example shows, not always and not under all conditions. The Kennedy tax cuts, for example, did produce economic growth.
Neera Tanden, President, Center for American Progress, Interview, C-SPAN, Q&A February 26, 2012
Sourced by: Eigen's Political and Historical Quotations
The traditional conservative tax principle has always been that low tax rates are needed to produce economic expansion and in general this had been so until Clinton and Rubin combined higher tax rates with great fiscal discipline of government spending and low interest rates, not only produced a great economic expansion but eliminated the Reagan deficit and left office with a huge projected surplus.
This quotation was very important because the most important economic principle of Republican ideology since the 1960s has been that tax cuts will produce economic growth and the converse: that tax increases will stifle economic growth. For 50 years the Republican nostrum for all economic problems has been to increase growth by cutting taxes and opposing all tax increases. However Leonhardt studied the data and results since 1987 and found that the Republican doctrine had been wrong. Economic growth plummeted when we had the largest tax cuts in the George W. Bush years and the greatest growth spurts were following the 1990 George W. Bush tax increase and the 1993 Bill Clinton tax cuts. When the data became public some Republicans took the view that taxes were just one of the factors determining economic growth and have been overwhelmed by other factors. Some Democrats argue that if this were really believed by Republicans, they would have favored these other factors more so than tax cuts when in fact tax cuts are always their nostrum.
Kennedy, with great Republican support proposed a reduction of the top income tax rate from 91% to 65%, reduction of the bottom rate from 20% to 14%, and a reduction in the corporate tax rate from 52% to 47%. That put the tax rates at the appropriate level. Economic growth was reasonable until President Reagan’s military spending cold war strategy produced huge deficits, Clinton raised the tax rates slightly and had the best economic growth ever, and had a balanced budget. George W. Bush lowered taxes had much slower growth and even larger deficits. However, by 2013 all hints of bipartisanship were gone. The Republicans claimed that the then tax rates were much too high—the highest income tax was half the rate that most agreed in 1962 was the right rate. And the corporate tax was 35 %, far lower than the Kennedy rate of 47% and incredibly lower when we consider that with deductions that were then in force the average corporate tax was only 12% the lowest since the Great Depression. Meanwhile the 2008 Bush Economic Meltdown and the Great Recession it produced the highest deficits in history with the lowest taxes in modern times and much of the polarized population demanding further tax cuts and an equal number demanding increased tax revenue.
Neera Tanden is an American political consultant and former government official. She is the president of the Center for American Progress, a liberal advocacy organization where she has worked in different capacities since its founding in 2003.
