Rupert Murdoch Quotes

People of conscience in our leadership in Washington have been scared off by the right and the fossil fuel lobbies. They won't even use the term "sustainability" or "climate change" in an energy bill, which is ludicrous on its face. It completely ignores the elephant in the room that we're all dealing with. The average American doesn't even believe climate change is real, they think it's all a hoax.

I think it's harder for people than it should be. But as more and more of us become carbon neutral and change the patterns in our lives to be part of the solution instead of part of the problem, we are now beginning to see the changes in policy that are needed.

The fact that companies are getting into building power plants that collect their own CO2 on-site shows there's some leadership in that industry. Some industries have seen the writing on the wall: that carbon will have to be managed.

It is not easy to attain carbon neutrality by 2050.

With the Green New Deal, Seoul is taking big steps to transition to a net-zero emissions economy in 2050.

We tour the world and my carbon footprint is massive. I feel like it's my responsibility to do something - not just to offset it but to help make a difference.

At the moment, every country arrives at climate negotiations seeking to keep their own emissions as high as possible. This is the logic of the madhouse, a recipe for collective suicide. We dont want a global suicide pact. We want a global survival pact

Now, as the world's largest economy and as the world's second largest emitter, America bears our responsibility to address climate change, and we intend to meet that responsibility.

I think all countries need to aim to cut the CO2 emissions per person, taking account of externalities like imports and exports.

We have at most ten years—not ten years to decide upon action, but ten years to alter fundamentally the trajectory of global greenhouse emissions.

Fighting climate change isn't just an obligation we owe to future generations. It's also an opportunity to improve public health - and drive economic growth - in the here and now.

A patchwork solution of provincial targets is an admission of defeat and a statement that we have failed our children and grandchildren.

I think [George W.] Bush has done nothing right about global warming.

I think we can lower our emissions. I think the world will be better off if we did that, and we can do it without cap and trade.

I believe we should reframe our response to climate change as an imperative for growth rather than merely being a way of being green or meeting environmental commitments.

Carbon zero simply means that the emissions you are releasing either are zero or balance out to zero.

You should be attacking the carbon emissions, period, and whether it's cap-and-trade or carbon tax or whatever, that's the realm in which we should be playing.

Future generations are not going to ask us what political party were you in. They are going to ask what did you do about it, when you knew the glaciers were melting.

Putting a tax on carbon could be an effective approach for curbing global warming pollution.

Creating mechanisms for ending deforestation and promoting regeneration of the environment is one of the most effective ways of achieving net-zero emissions.

We need a crash program to decarbonize the economy, a big ask, but nothing less will save us.

Taking bold action on climate change simply makes good business sense. It's also the right thing to do for people and the planet. Setting a net-zero GHG emissions target by 2050 will drive innovation, grow jobs, build prosperity, and secure a better world for what will soon be 9 billion people.

California continues to pass the most ambitious laws in the world to expand clean energy and combat climate change.

There are many different ways we can choose to reduce our carbon impacts.

The move to a zero-carbon future is unstoppable.