Phillip E. Johnson Quotes

It is right that we be concerned with the scientific probity of metaphysics.

It is a great advantage for a system of philosophy to be substantially true.

Let us come to the philosophers, whose authority is of greater weight, and their judgment more to be relied on, because they are believed to have paid attention, not to matters of fiction, but to the investigation of the truth.

First, philosophy concerns itself with all kinds of issues that don't get much airtime in day-to-day life. What's the nature of reality? Can we ever truly know anything, and if so, how? What does it mean to be a moral agent? And while we're at it, is there any such thing as agency anyway?

Metaphysics is the finding of bad reasons for what we believe upon instinct; but to find these reasons is no less an instinct.

Modern secular thought has its own dualism: It treats only the physical world as knowable and testable, while locking everything else - mind, spirit, morality, meaning - into the realm of private, subjective feelings. The so-called fact/value split.

I don't think there's an interesting boundary between philosophy and science. Science is totally beholden to philosophy. There are philosophical assumptions in science and there's no way to get around that.

I think that reality exists and that it's knowable.

When it comes to the real operational issues that govern our understanding of physical reality, ontological definitions of classical philosophers are, in my opinion, sterile.

Initially, I studied philosophy, because it claimed to give you answers to the meaning of existence, but it didn't: It was basically a semantics game.

Truth in philosophy means that concept and external reality correspond.

Since Plato, we have been considering the nature of knowledge, the meaning of meaning and the status of the physical world.

It has generally been assumed that of two opposing systems of philosophy, e.g., realism and idealism, one only can be true and one must be false; and so philosophers have been hopelessly divided on the question, which is the true one.

Philosophy was once considered science.

The two basic topics which fascinate me are 'What is reality?' and 'What constitutes the authentic human being?'

Philosophy is altogether less pure now. It's been impurified by science and social science and history.

I bought some books in order to learn the first principles of philosophy.

If somebody is going to try to paste a person's view on epistemology to me, then give me Thomas Aquinas. Don't give me Ayn Rand.

I secretly think reality exists so we can speculate about it.

I am now convinced that theoretical physics is actually philosophy.

I discovered philosophy in my youth when I read 'wildly,' and thus I was exposed to the world of ideas.

Philosophy changes day by day.

Philosophy is an odd thing. When we use the word in everyday speech, you know, you sometimes hear it hilariously.

Well, I don't know if I can comment on Kant or Hegel because I'm no real philosopher in the sense of knowing what these people have said in any detail so let me not comment on that too much.

Philosophy: A route of many roads leading from nowhere to nothing.