Rush Limbaugh Quotes

California is going to be quite good for the Democrats. But the rest of the country is a draw.

The environment is better and better for Democrats.

The Democrats do fine in presidential elections; their problem is they can't get out the vote in the midterm elections.

I do believe that 2016 is going to be a great year for Democrats... because we are right on the key issues.

Democrats are not a national party. They have lost governorships, state legislatures, mayoralties. They have lost 1,500 seats since elections, 2010, '12, '14, it's been devastating. And it's all Obama.

It's almost a very rough rule of thumb: when Democrats are able to successfully frame the meaning of an election season around middle-class fears, Democrats win the election; when Republicans are able to successfully frame the meaning of an election season around cultural fears, Republicans win the election.

I used to vote Democrat.

The victor will be the one who gets the most voters out.

I think people are going to have a choice to make in the fall. But I think there's no doubt there are enough seats in play that could cause Republicans to gain control. There's no doubt about that.

Incumbent White House parties have won 10 of the last 18 presidential elections; the odds are tight, but they favor Obama in 2012. And so gloomy Democrats, check your despair; gleeful Republicans, watch the hubris.

The election before us will be the Austerlitz of American politics.

Democrats haven't been functioning effectively as a party at the national level.

The way to help this country is to limit Republican power.

The Democratic Party eats its young before the election, and then they weep and wail when they lose.

I propose to be mayor for the Republicans, Progressives, Socialists, and independent voters as well as the Democrats.

In the Democratic party they call the people who lost the last election losers. In the Republican party, we call them the next nominee.

Parties do often nominate losers.

In the 2016 U.S. presidential election, celebrity endorsements possibly damaged Hillary Clinton, since they allowed Donald Trump to emphasise that she was part of an out-of-touch elite. That is ironic, given that Mr Trump owed his election victory to his own celebrity status on a TV reality show.

In the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, American voters were forced to choose between a liberal Democrat and weak establishment Republicans. Democrats won both times.

Democrats and progressives do well when the voter turnout is high. Republicans do well when the voter turnout is low.

It turned out that Democrats did not come out in the numbers they came out for, for Barack Obama. Five million fewer voters than went for Barack Obama back in 2012. So, what went wrong?

It's the Democrat Party that is destroying the integrity of the American electoral system. It's not Vladimir Putin. It's not Dmitry Medvedev. It's the Democrat Party, which has sought to destroy the integrity of the American electoral system, all because they're a bunch of spoilsports who lost the election.

Democrats don't have a lot of time to turn the party around.

Hillary Clinton, [Democrats] say, leads the popular vote by two million, and a shift of a few votes in a few states would have won the election.

At the same time, you had Barack Obama as a president. You had Hillary Clinton on track, all the Democrats looking good. And, you know, Donald Trump was just an entertaining buffoon to watch. And, over time, you came to realize that Donald Trump was appealing to a lot of people with his populist message. And, slowly, I think, even as a show, we started shifting in tone as the election started shifting.