Arun Jaitley Quotes

When it comes to terrorism, the only path to safety is the path to action.

We don’t intend to live with terrorism forever. We will do whatever is necessary …

I think the debate in our society now is that people have to agree on zero-tolerance to terrorism.

Terrorism needs to be fought against and certainly delegitimized or attacked, but some of the underlying grievances that might in fact lead individuals astray to terrorism cannot be ignored.

We need to get ready for a world where terrorism will not ever fully go away.

The prompt assimilation of that intelligence will be essential if we are to avoid another September 11th.

The British don't runaway from terrorism. We have had 30-odd years of terrorism in our own country from the Irish Republican Army. We're used to it.

I believe that work can be done on security; in combating terrorism in Mexico we have done our part in this area. But at the same time, the world must continue working.

We are keeping New Jersey one step, several steps, ahead of terrorism.

If we wait for threats to fully materialize, we will have waited too long …. The war on terrorism will not be won on the defensive.

A compromise appears out of reach on the stripping of terrorists' nationality.

Terror is a tactic. We can not wage "war" against a tactic.

It seems like we're spending billions of dollars on whiz-bang technology and not enough money on human resources, which really is proven to be the most effective way of stopping terrorism.

Most of the people who were responsible for 9/11 are now in custody or have been killed. But there are others, and they plot and they plan, and they hope to pull it off again. And while we have to be right 100 percent of the time, they only have to be right once. So there's no way to overreact to that.

When I was director of public prosecutions, from 2008 to 2013, I had a first-rate counter-terrorism team, who worked closely with the police and the security and intelligence services to defeat and disrupt terrorism.

There's a difference between those who breed terrorism and those who fight terrorism. This difference should be recognised by the people of India.

In 2001, terrorism was fought in a completely different way.

Italy remains deeply engaged in the global fight against terrorism as well as on domestic programmes against radicalisation.

Responding to terrorism inevitably implies military consequences. This may shock some people, but these groups must also be dealt with on a military footing. I won't use the word 'combat' to avoid being painted as a crusader.

Terrorism needs to be de-legitimized in the way that slavery has been. Doing so will make governments and individuals think twice before becoming a party to terrorism; it should also make it less difficult to garner support for international action against those who nevertheless carry it out.

The bottom line is we are pursuing every single possible action to keep our country safe from terrorism.

Defeating a terrorist organization is like fighting a forest fire; there's never a clear moment of victory, and even after you've won, you have to watch carefully.

Terrorism and the fight against extremism is our fight.

Our country will continue efforts to prevent terrorism in close cooperation with the United States and the international community.

The political solutions proposed against encryption are not going to work against terrorism.