Dan Lipinski Quotes

Faced with the profound changes that AI technologies can produce, pressure for "more" and "tougher" regulation is inevitable. Misunderstanding about what AI is and is not, especially against a background of scare-mongering, could fuel opposition to technologies that could benefit everyone. This would be a tragic mistake. Regulation that stifles innovation, or relocates it to other jurisdictions, would be similarly counterproductive.

The intersection of law, politics, and technology is going to force a lot of good thinking.

'Cyber-security' is one of those hot topics that has launched a thousand seminars and strategy papers without producing much in the way of policy.

While we rejoice in the new possibilities open to humanity, we also see the dangers arising from these possibilities, and we must ask ourselves how we can overcome them.

As a factual matter, as in countries all over the world, technology and business practices have been running faster than legal responses and developments.

There are dangers, but only dangers if people don't understand where technology is taking us.

I put my life in danger every time I do some of these demonstrations, whether it's in the audience hanging upside down or on the stage. We now have a lot of dangerous stunts where anything can go wrong. In fact, I have fallen two stories and landed on the stage, so I am well aware of the dangers.

Personally, I believe that government, rather than money, tends to be the primary factor limiting the development of new technologies.

If you don't have a voice that forces you back to basics, you're a dangerous person. Or to put it another way: You're at risk, and the people with you are at risk. I'm not a daredevil. I don't fly without a safety net.

The extent to which ethics leads or lags the scientific juggernaut will now be measured in the specific policy decisions our democratic political systems produce.

Our technology has already outstripped our ability to control it.

The safety and security of the nation depends more so than ever before on intelligence.

The amount of our danger, therefore, it would be impolitic to conceal from the people. It was the first duty of ministers to make it known, and after doing so, it should have been their study to provide against it, and to point out the means to the country by which it might be averted.

The regulators can’t do it. These institutions are just too large and complex.

Technology can progress to an entire new generation in the time it takes one legislative committee to issue a report. Regulation of technology confronts us with two radically different time scales.

We have to make sure that there is a legitimate security need. We don’t just do anything because we can.

We are much better at creating complex technologies than we are at controlling them.

The biggest risks posed by nuclear power come not from the technology but from the human institutions that govern how we use it.

Technology will save us if it doesn't wipe us out first.

Technology is always ahead of the law.

The expert is out to point out all the difficulties and dangers.

In holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite.

There is a cost to every decision, and whether or not you impose a public health order has costs to industry and the public.

When you have millions of small companies using your site and billions of dollars in transactions every day, the government cares….They care that I can unstabalize the country.

We cannot wait for regulators to catch up with science.