Kat Dennings Quotes

Privacy may actually be an anomaly.

Law-abiding citizens value privacy. Terrorists require invisibility. The two are not the same, and they should not be confused.

I've got nothing to hide.

Secret government programs that pry into people's private affairs are bound up with ideas about secrecy and privacy that arose during the process by which the mysterious became secular.

I really fight for my privacy.

I just knew at an early time in my life how important privacy was.

If we give up all our privacy rights, have we become any safer?

I'm not dying for everyone to hear everything we do. Forty minutes every two years is sensible.

Oh, well, there's a difference between privacy and secrecy.

Privacy under what circumstance? Privacy at home under what circumstances? You have more privacy if everyone's illiterate, but you wouldn't really call that privacy. That's ignorance.

Privacy isn't negotiable. It's the right of every American.

We have to examine very carefully any privacy-reducing technology.

Nothing in human life is inherently private.

I don't have anything to hide.

The public must know about the general outlines of surveillance activities in order to evaluate whether the government is achieving the appropriate balance between privacy and security.

In our view, the current storage by the government of bulk meta-data creates potential risks to public trust, personal privacy, and civil liberty.

Privacy violations should be considered criminal offences.

There must always be a balance between protecting privacy and security. In our country, one of the ways we have struck that balance is by requiring a court order before law enforcement can access certain communications of and data on suspects.

In 'The Transparent Society,' I am actually no radical. I accept that some secrecy is necessary and avow that human beings have an intrinsic need for some privacy.

I accept you need the right balance, people do need to know their privacy is protected, but when it's essential information which will be dealt with by security agencies... I do feel the public interest overrides that.

Privacy above all else. Some day, in the future, people will look back and remember how beautiful it once was.

I do suspect that privacy was a passing fad.

Have you noticed the people most likely to be up in arms about governments apparently spying on us tend to be the most non-private people you know? The people launching petitions and wailing about Big Brother and data collection are most likely to be the most constant self-presenters.

I particularly recognize that reasonable people can disagree as to what that proper balance or blend is between privacy and security and safety.

In intelligence work, there are limits to the amount of information one can share. Confidentiality is essential.